A Portfolio of Lesson Plans for a High School Spanish Classroom with Critical Reflection

Syracuse University Syracuse University

SURFACE SURFACE

Syracuse University Honors Program Capstone

Projects

Syracuse University Honors Program Capstone

Projects

Summer 8-10-2017

A Portfolio of Lesson Plans for a High School Spanish Classroom A Portfolio of Lesson Plans for a High School Spanish Classroom

with Critical Re6ection with Critical Re6ection

Jasmyn Chacko

Follow this and additional works at: https://surface.syr.edu/honors_capstone

Part of the Spanish Linguistics Commons, and the Spanish Literature Commons

Recommended Citation Recommended Citation

Chacko, Jasmyn, "A Portfolio of Lesson Plans for a High School Spanish Classroom with Critical

Re6ection" (2017).

Syracuse University Honors Program Capstone Projects

. 1002.

https://surface.syr.edu/honors_capstone/1002

This Honors Capstone Project is brought to you for free and open access by the Syracuse University Honors Program

Capstone Projects at SURFACE. It has been accepted for inclusion in Syracuse University Honors Program Capstone

Projects by an authorized administrator of SURFACE. For more information, please contact surface@syr.edu.

iii

Abstract

This Capstone projects features a portfolio of lesson plans along with assessments of

these lesson plans, written by a site supervisor, and journal entries, written personally

after teaching the lesson in the classroom. After reviewing and analyzing all of these

documents, general reflections were written to show the changes I made over time and to

consider what future improvements I commit to make. These general reflections will be

supplemented with current research in the field of second language pedagogy and the

critique written by my site supervisor. Overall, the goal of this Capstone project is to

produce useful materials in my profession and evaluate myself as a future teacher.

Executive Summary

This Capstone project aims to show my growth over the course of the Spring 2017

semester during which I was a student teacher at a local, urban high school. The project

also evaluates my strengths and weaknesses as a future teacher with the belief that

extensive self-reflection will lead to concrete improvements in my future teaching

positions. The process of creating this project and dedicating time to reflecting on my

abilities already sparked changes in my instructional choices during my field placement

as a student teacher.

This project begins by providing the audience with the necessary background

knowledge to understand the following two chapters in the context of the classroom in

which I worked. While maintaining anonymity of the students and staff, the introduction

provides information about the school, the student body, and my role in the classroom

that influenced my decisions in the classroom and the creation of this project.

With this foundation laid, the second chapter features a portfolio of lesson plans,

accompanied by observation reports from my site supervisor and my own self-reflections.

The site supervisor is a Syracuse University staff member in the School of Education who

visited my field placement to observe my lessons and communicate with my host teacher.

She wrote a report after each observation as well a Mid-Placement and End-of-Placement

report. These documents, along with my journal entries, serve two main purposes; firstly,

they provide a broad range of insights to illustrate how each lesson was implemented and

with what success. Secondly, these documents are the evidence referenced for general

reflections in the third chapter. The reports from my site supervisor are especially

valuable sources that detail my weaknesses, strengths, and improvements. I use quotes

from these reports along with explicit connections to research on language pedagogy to

answer a series of reflective questions about the full experience as a student teacher and

my growth during that three-month period. I compile the qualitative data that comes from

these documents to form the responses for the prompting questions. The questions are as

follows:

 What main changes did I make as the weeks progressed? Were they positive or

negative changes and to what extent?

 What motivated me to make these changes? Was it conscious?

 What were my greatest strengths and weaknesses? Which populations did I fail to

reach? What were my greatest challenges?

 How did the target field placement differ from my prior suburban placement?

 What aspects of the lessons could be transferred to other levels and other

populations?

 Did my activities align with a specific pedagogical approach or theory? Have I

begun to create my own teaching style?

These questions structure the narrative for Chapter Three and summarize my successes

and failures as a future teacher.

One of the most significant observations when reviewing the data is how the use

of the target language, in this case Spanish, changes. Successful second language

acquisition requires sufficient input, which in a foreign language setting comes in the

language classroom, but, unfortunately, I often depended on English in the beginning of

my field placement. The constructive criticism of my site supervisor and my host teacher

spurred gradual, but significant changes in my instructional choices, from how I wrote

my lesson plans to how I implemented them. This project explores similar situations in

which I improved an element of my teaching, such as the decrease in lecture-style

teaching, but also recognizes that there are still areas in which I need to improve.

Classroom management was the aspect of teaching that most challenged me. It

was a weakness that I had expected and was hesitant to confront. With the support of my

site supervisor and host teacher, I learned techniques that I eventually began to

implement. The differences between the start of my placement and the end of my

placement are made evident with comparisons of quotes from the reports included in the

body of Chapter Two as well as those in the Appendices. Each aspect of my teaching is

analyzed with the intention of improving as a pre-service teacher and integrating the

lessons I learned this semester in my future teaching positions.

vii

Table of Contents

Abstract..........................................................................................................iii

Executive Summary………………………….……………….…………....iv

List of Abbreviations................................................................................... ix

Acknowledgements ……………………………………….................……viii

Chapter 1: Introduction ………………………………………………..2

1.1 Project Overview....................……………………………...........…….…2

1.2 Teaching Context…………………………………..............….................5

1.3 Lesson Plan Format....................................................................................6

Chapter 2: Lesson Plan Portfolio................................................................. 13

2.1 Lesson #1...................................................................................................13

2.1.1 Lesson Plan #1............................................................................13

2.1.3 Site Supervisor Observation Report ………………..................18

2.1.2 Journal Entry………………………………......................…….21

2.2 Lesson #2...................................................................................................23

2.2.1 Lesson Plan #2……………………………….............…….......23

2.2.2 Site Supervisor Observation Report…………………………...26

2.2.3 Journal Entry…………………………………….......................30

2.3 Lesson #3…………………………………………………………….......31

2.3.1 Lesson Plan #3……………………………...............…….........31

2.3.2 Site Supervisor Observation Report ……………………...…...36

2.3.3 Journal Entry ……………………………………......................39

2.4 Lesson #4…………………………………………………………….......40

2.4.1 Lesson Plan #4…………………………………..................…..40

2.4.2 Site Supervisor Observation Report ……………………….…..44

2.4.3 Journal Entry………………….......…………………................49

Chapter 3: General Reflections……………………............................…... 51

3.1....................................................................................................................51

3.1.1.....................................................................................................51

3.1.2.....................................................................................................55

3.1.3.....................................................................................................56

3.2....................................................................................................................57

3.3....................................................................................................................60

3.3.1.....................................................................................................60

3.3.2.....................................................................................................62

3.3.3.....................................................................................................63

3.4....................................................................................................................66

3.4.1.....................................................................................................67

3.4.2.....................................................................................................67

3.5....................................................................................................................70

3.6....................................................................................................................71

viii

Works Cited.……………………………………………………………… 76

Appendices………………………………………………………………… 79

A. End-of-Placement Final Assessment by Site Supervisor...........................79

B. Mid-Placement Assessment by Site Supervisor.........................................84

C. Lesson Plan #1 Class Materials..................................................................88

D. Lesson Plan #3 Class Materials..................................................................89

D.1 Rubric for the Plan a Trip Project.................................................89

D.2 Cornell Research Sheet for the Plan a Trip Project......................90

List of Abbreviations

 SLA: The field of Second Language Acquisition

 L1: First or native language

 L2: Second, foreign, or additional Language

 CLT: Communicative Language Teaching, the mainstream method used in many

contexts in the US and around the world.

 IEP: Individualized Education Program, a document designed for each student who

require special education. The document includes appropriate modifications,

comments from former teachers, descriptions of the student’s disability, and more.

 504: A 504 Plan is similar to an IEP in that its objective is to ensure an accessible

learning environment by informing the teacher how to accommodate this specific

student’s needs. Students with 504 plans do not require specialized education, but

benefit from certain modifications and accommodations to make the content and

classroom accessible.

 ELL: English Language Learner, which is a student who is learning English, which

is the L1 in this case, and his or her lower proficiency in English may affect his or

her performance in classes including that of foreign language

 ACTFL: American Council on the Teaching of Foreign Languages, a national

organization with the mission of promoting the acquisition of foreign languages

through formal study in American schools

 Target Language: The language being taught; the L2.

 Native-Speaker: A student who learned Spanish either prior to or concurrently with

English. If concurrently, the student is also considered a bilingual speaker.

 Heritage Learner: A student who may have had some exposure to the target

language from family members, but whose first language is still a language other

than the target language, generally English in this context. Some authors consider

these learners to be native-speakers as well.

 SOE: School of Education (of Syracuse University)

Acknowledgements

I would like to thank my Capstone advisor, Amanda Brown, and reader, Emma Ticio.

They supported me, believed in me, and taught me so much. I would also like to thank

Katie Clinton, who encouraged me to join the Spanish Education program. I also am

grateful to the many host teachers who invited me into their classrooms with open arms,

especially this past semester as a student teacher. Lastly, I would like to thank the Honors

faculty, my family, and friends.

Chapter One: Introduction

1.1 Project Overview

This project traces a three-month period of student teaching and examines the

instructional choices I made as a student teacher and how those choices changed over

time. The project consists of three chapters. Chapter One provides a range of background

information such as the organization of the placement, the structure of placement

documentation (e.g. lesson plans), and a description of the teaching placement. Chapter

Two collates all the data from the lesson plans, site supervisor observation forms, and

self-reflective journal entries. Chapter Three explores my reflections in response to

several guiding questions with explicit references to evidence found in Chapter Two and

the Appendices. Finally, the Appendices include assessment reports from the site

supervisor and class materials from the lessons.

While documenting my student teaching experience for the purpose of this

Capstone Project, I followed the schedule mandated by the School of Education

Professional Conduct Standards and the program-specific supplement for the Spanish

Education program. The gradual release of responsibility from the host teacher, also

referred to as the cooperating teacher, to myself as the student teacher occurred over the

course of three phases. The School of Education Standards document outlines the

schedule of those phases. The first phase comprised almost one month and was

characterized by minimal autonomy and a greater dependence on the host teacher. In the

second phase, also approximately one month long, I began independently teaching one

class of students. In the final phrase, lasting just over two weeks, I assumed responsibility

for a total of three classes of students. With each phase, then, I had greater responsibility

and independence in the classroom.

The data featured in Chapter Two are from Phases Two and Three of the School of

Education (SOE) Standards document, and thus reflect original and independent planning

and autonomous student teaching. My original development of these lesson plans during

my field placement followed the SOE’s four-page limit; however I extended these plans,

and specifically the rationale section of each plan, for the Capstone project in order to

draw from a wider research base. I wanted to take advantage of the flexibility of the

Capstone project to make the connections between my instructional choices and the

research literature more explicit. For each of the four representative lesson plans included

in this project, I had access to the textbook used by the Spanish department of the high

school and all supplies and materials already present in my host teacher’s classroom;

nonetheless, I often created my own materials or adapted previously created materials to

fit the specific needs of my lesson plans.

A Site Supervisor Observation Report follows each of the four lesson plans. The

site supervisor, a staff member from Syracuse University, visited the school to observe

and evaluate lessons taught by me as the student teacher and discussed any concerns with

the host teacher. Within seventy-two hours after each site visit, the site supervisor was

required to submit an observation report to the Spanish Education Department and to the

student teacher using a template that was created by the School of Education. Unlike the

lesson plans included in Chapter Two, the text of the site supervisor’s feedback was

presented in an unmodified way; names have been removed to maintain anonymity, but

the narratives and the data are in their original format and therefore may have

typographical issues.

To conclude each lesson section, I have included my self-reflective journal entries,

which were composed soon after the lesson was taught. The reflective journal entries for

each class provide a short-term summary of the class, including its strengths, weaknesses,

and a qualitative description of student progress. Occasionally, I included plans for future

iterations of the same lesson. The entries comprised a combination of my own informal

notes made immediately after class as well records of communications between the host

teacher, placement supervisor, and myself held in face-to-face discussions and by email

within 72 hours after the class. Thus, the contents of each reflective journal entry were

collected within three days of the class and revised as necessary for the Capstone project.

All of the data described are additionally referenced in Chapter Three as evidence

supporting reflections.

In Chapter Three, I examine all data collected in order to reflect on the changes in

my teaching practice over the three-month experience as a student teacher, my

competence in a variety of dispositions necessary to be a successful teacher, and the areas

of focus for future improvement. The chapter is organized based on the following guiding

questions:

 What main changes did I make as the weeks progressed? Were they positive or

negative changes and to what extent?

 What motivated me to make these changes? Was it conscious?

 What were my greatest strengths and weaknesses? Which populations did I fail to

reach? What were my greatest challenges?

 How did the target field placement differ from my prior suburban placement?

 What aspects of the lessons could be transferred to other levels and other

populations? Did my activities align with a specific pedagogical approach or

theory? Have I begun to create my own teaching style?

These questions were written to fit the aim of my Capstone project, which was to

evaluate my work as a student teacher and to reflect on how I can improve in the future.

The questions serve that purpose by requiring evidence of how my instructional choices

either did or did not meet the expectations of the site supervisor, my host teacher, and

myself. My answers to the questions are guided not only by these parties’ statements,

found in the observation reports and self-reflective journal entries in Chapter Two and

final assessment reports in the Appendices, but also by current research in the field of

language pedagogy.

1.2 Teaching Context

The target field placement described in this project was at a charter high school in

an urban district, which was created with the mission of preparing students to be college

and career-ready with both academic and vocational skills. The vocational program

included different tracks for students to dedicate themselves to three different fields:

media, culinary, and auto. These vocational options were chosen purposely to supplement

the opportunities in other surrounding high schools, e.g. other high schools in the district

have tracks in cosmetology. The name of this school has not been included in this project

to protect the identity and confidentiality of the staff. Similarly, pseudonyms have been

used for students, my site supervisor, and my host teacher to respect their privacy.

My focus class was the Level Three Spanish course, a one-year course in the

Spanish language. This course occurred during three periods each day. Each period was

48 minutes long. The classes were small in size with the largest at thirteen students and

the smallest at eight students. Such class sizes were not typical of the Spanish program at

this school, and the host teacher has been accustomed to larger classes in the past.

However, the smaller class size was more manageable for me and allowed me to build

stronger connections to my students. The Level Three courses were mostly made of tenth

grade students; eleventh graders typically take Level Four and seniors may take the

Syracuse University Project Advanced (SUPA) class for college credits. Proficiency

assignments were not based on age, but rather on performance and ability. For example,

many heritage learners and native-speakers took placement exams to forego the beginner

level courses since their background knowledge would likely be more advanced than the

Level One and Two curriculums.

In cooperation with the high school’s Spanish department, I used the textbook that

the Spanish teachers were piloting. Published by Santillana and titled “Español,” this

textbook was selected specifically for the Level Three course. I utilized the pre-made

activities and readings and other resources in the classroom to create my lessons.

Additional resources included the classroom’s smartboard, large whiteboard, and access

to laptops when requested. The students also often used teacher-designed worksheets,

Spanish-English dictionaries, and occasionally the Internet to supplement the classroom

materials. I listed any necessary materials in the lesson plan and copies of said materials

are located in the Appendices.

1.3 Lesson Plan Format

Chapter Two explores four lessons, each with their own lesson plan. The purpose of

lesson plans are to provide direction and a record of the class activities. By designing the

plan for each class beforehand, the teacher is able to utilize time more efficiently, keep

students on task, and present information in a way that is seamless and comprehensible.

The lesson plan format used in this project follows the template provided by the School

of Education at Syracuse University. This template was designed in order to fit the

guidelines of the New York State (NYS) foreign language teaching and learning

standards and to prepare students for the edTPA certification exam, one of the required

assessments to receive a NYS teacher’s certification. In order to understand the

procedure, rationale, and implementation of each lesson plan, it is crucial to first

comprehend the purpose of each section. This section provides explanations for each

subsection of the lesson plan in the order it is listed in the template.

The header to each lesson plan gives the essential information: the teacher, the

lesson title, the date, and the class. All lessons included in this project were designed for

the instruction of the same Level Three class, which I taught for almost an entire

semester. The lesson plans selected for analysis were over a relatively long time frame.

Lesson #1 occurred on February 27

, and the last lesson of the project, Lesson #4,

occurred on April 6

. By controlling the level and the class, and varying plans over time,

the selection of target lesson plans was designed for the greatest likelihood of

professional development. Since the level and the class remained constant, the focus

could be on how the instructional choices changed based on when they were created. The

Capstone project starts with the lesson from February 16

and ends with that of April 6

to show the changes that occurred over a couple of months.

The next section of each lesson plan is the “Instructional Context”, which shows the

lesson’s class fit and curriculum alignment. The section begins with a narrative about

how the lesson incorporates information about the student body, which can be found

under the following question: “What do I know about my students that will inform this

lesson? Are there any particular student strengths, interests, background, needs related to

the lesson?” The teacher must recognize the prerequisites for the lesson and be assured

that the students possess these required skills or knowledge. For example, if a lesson’s

objective is the mastery of the conjugation of obligatory verbs like deber ‘must’ and tener

que ‘have to”, the students must understand the general concept of conjugation. If the

teacher is instructing students to conjugate the aforementioned verbs and they do not

understand the general concept of conjugation (of any verb), it is clear that the lesson

objective was inappropriate for this student body and/ or for this time period within the

school year. This section is usually general and does not require the teacher to talk about

specific students, rather he or she would talk about general trends. In a later section, there

is a more appropriate section to discuss specific student groups or even specific

individuals; the teacher discusses how to meet the needs of certain students and groups in

the last section of the lesson plan titled “Differentiation/ Planned Supports for Students.”

Referring back to the “Instructional Context,” the next question is: “How does this

lesson connect with and build on the previous lessons?” In other words, the teacher must

articulate why the present day’s activity is an appropriate next step from the previous

lesson and appropriate precursor to the next day’s work. Moreover, the teacher can

demonstrate, for example, that the timing of a given lesson is purposefully representative

of the central focus of the learning segment, which will be discussed next. Since the

transitions between each day’s lesson should be logical and smooth, this section urges the

teacher to think explicitly about a bigger picture and connections between lessons. This is

important because students respond, both emotionally response and in their grasp of the

content, when the development and timeline of the lessons is organized, comprehensible,

and seamless.

The next segment of the lesson plan is the “Central Focus”, which is the

overarching objective of the learning segment. A learning segment is usually three to five

lessons (or days given that there is one lesson per day). Each of these lessons has its own

narrower objective. Several learning segments in sequence form a unit. A unit may last a

few weeks or even close to two months.

Under the category of “Standards,” the teacher will list standards that relate to the

day’s activities and objectives. My lessons follow New York State Standards as well as

the American Council on the Teaching of Foreign Languages (ACTFL) Standards. The

New York State Education Department’s mission is to provide quality educational

opportunities to gain skills and expand knowledge for all New York residents. ACTFL is

a nationwide professional organization of language educators, administrators, and

students with the goal of improving all levels of language instruction for all languages.

The “Learning Objective”, also referred to as the “Lesson Objective”, is the

content-related goal for the students to accomplish by the end of the day’s lesson. A

common way to write a lesson objective is to finish the following sentence starter:

“Students will be able to....” (SWBAT) Lesson Objectives should be specific and

measurable. They are also highly related to “Can-Do” statements, which are lesson

objectives that are rewritten in the perspective of the student. “I can...” ACTFL has

published a series of Can-Do statements that are representative of each level of

proficiency according to their standards (ACTFL). The ACTFL publication will be a

point of reference within the upcoming lesson plans, as well as the third chapter, of this

project. Nonetheless, lesson objectives in these lesson plans are written using the

previously mentioned sentence starter, SWBAT.

The section on “Academic Language Demands” details the lesson’s critical content:

it is the words, structures, or rules that the students must learn in order to meet the lesson

objective. There are three possible items under academic language: vocabulary, syntax,

and discourse. For a language classroom, these possibilities are straightforward; students

learn vocabulary in different lexical sets, a variety of tenses using multiple types of verbs,

and learn how to communicate in the target language to succeed in a multitude of

language tasks. Language tasks might include writing a letter, asking someone to do

something, and constructing a text with culturally appropriate abbreviations.

The body and often the majority of the lesson plan contain procedures; it is formally

known as the “Instructional Strategies and Learning Tasks.” Each row includes the time

the teacher allots for the activity, a description of the activity, and the rationale and

research that supports the instructional choice. The level of detail for this section varies

dependent on the particular teacher’s style, needs, and experience. For the purpose of this

project, the lesson plans were rather detailed to give a thorough understanding and clear

view of the actions taken in the classroom. As a foreign language teacher, the lesson

plans should also demonstrate the use of the target language, which in this teaching

context is Spanish. After reviewing a series of lesson plans, an administrator or other

reader should be able to estimate the ratio of the use of the L1, English, to the L2,

Spanish. L1 and L2 are terms used in the language instruction community that stand for

first or native language, and second or foreign language, respectively.

The next section of the lesson plan is self-explanatory. Transparently titled

“Materials and Resources”, the teacher includes any worksheets, videos, school supplies,

or other tools necessary to successfully implement the plan. This acts as a reminder to

teachers of what to prepare, and demonstrates the steps of implementation of the planned

activities.

The lesson plan concludes with the following section: “Differentiation and Planned

Support for Students.” Differentiation is the process of modifying or providing

alternatives for the variety of students and student needs in the classroom. This section

ensures that the lesson reaches all students by asking the following questions: “How will

you support students with gaps in the prior knowledge that is necessary to be successful

in this lesson?”, “Strategies for responding to individual students or groups of students

with similar learning styles, needs, IEPs or 504, ELL. What alternative approaches do

you have to content for these students?” and “Strategies for responding to common errors

and misunderstandings. What alternative approaches do you have to content if you need

it?” Answers to these questions provide specific examples of how the teacher plans to

differentiate instruction. A teacher may accommodate their diverse student body by

differentiating the breadth of content, the format of an assessment, or the materials in the

classroom. Differentiation is incredibly important to meet the needs of all students,

especially students with Individualized Education Programs (IEPs) or 504 plans. These

documents help a teacher understand what accommodations and modifications are

necessary and appropriate for students with disabilities or special needs. English language

learners, struggling readers, and gifted students are often the focus of differentiation as

well. While shifts in the lesson may cater to a specific group, differentiation is not

exclusively for students with the aforementioned needs; differentiation improves the

learning environment and experience for all students.

With this explanation of each section of the lesson plan template, one can imagine

how the lesson would be implemented and better form an opinion on its implementation,

using the following documents: the Site Supervisor Observation Report and the Self-

Reflection. All of these documents, for each of the four lesson plans, can be found in the

upcoming chapter.

Chapter Two: Lesson Plan Portfolio

Chapter Two presents the portfolio of data on which the general reflections in

Chapter Three are based. The chapter is organized into four mains sections, reflecting

each of the four lesson plans. Each section begins with the lesson plan, followed by the

site supervisor report, and finally by a reflective journal entry. As noted in Chapter One,

the lesson plans were edited after the teaching placement for the purpose of the Capstone

to include references to relevant research literature. However, the site supervisor reports

and reflective journal entries are presented as they were collected during the teaching

placement itself, and thus an informal register and some typographical errors may be

present.

2.1 Lesson #1: Mid-Year Benchmark Speaking Practice

2.1.1 Lesson Plan #1: Mid-Year Benchmark Speaking Practice

Name

Jasmyn Chacko

Lesson Title

Mid-Year Benchmark Speaking Practice

Date (including day of week)

February 16, 2017

Grade Level & Class Title

Spanish Level Three

Period or Block (# of minutes)

Periods 2, 4/5, 10

Instructional Context

o What do I know about my students that will inform this lesson? Are there any particular student strengths, interests,

background, needs related to the lesson?

The Mid-Year Benchmark Speaking Practice is an assessment that occurs at the midpoint of the year. It is an oral interview

between one student and the teacher in a private setting, usually at the back of a classroom or in a hallway. The assessment

requires the student to engage in a six-line conversation entirely in Spanish. At the time of the exam, the conversation is

assigned to the student randomly and the student will not have time to prepare answers. The student may not use notes or

dictionaries. The conversation relates to vocabulary and grammar that the student has already learned, meaning he or she

must recall background knowledge to succeed in this assessment.

One of my students’ weaknesses is a difficulty to spontaneously produce Spanish orally, which is typical for this level.

Many class activities allow students to prepare an answer by writing it on their paper or directly on their desk in Expo

markers. When we debrief after these activities, students often volunteer to participate and will read their answer aloud. Fear

of mispronunciation or public speaking does not seem to hinder the whole class in this way. On the other hand, if the

activity requires the students to speak in Spanish without any preparation, the number of volunteers is usually minimal or

there are none at all. The students’ proficiency tends to be stronger in writing or reading, while listening and speaking may

be more difficult. It is clear that speaking, in particular, gives them more anxiety. Nonetheless this learning segment

culminates in an oral exam called the Mid-Year Benchmark. This combines two anxiety-inducing tasks for my students:

spontaneous, oral production and an assessment. “Foreign language anxiety frequently shows up in testing situations.

Students commonly report to counselors that they ‘know’ a certain grammar point but ‘forget’ it during a test or an oral

exercise when many grammar points must be remembered and coordinated simultaneously...If the student realizes s/he is

making preventable errors during the test, anxiety – and errors – may escalate” (Horwitz, 126). To accommodate for this

prediction, I am using ample time to scaffold the skill of spontaneous, oral production before asking them to participate in a

conversation in the context of the exam. We started this process in the previous lesson and will continue to practice today.

These two days are completely dedicated to preparation for the exam.

The students can be really competitive and enjoy learning and reviewing through games. Through my observations, I have

noticed that even students who rarely participate can become quite engaged during games. This refers to both those students

who are simply more introverted, but also those who are harder to motivate or keep on task. The games we have chosen for

today do not water down the content, but still keep the students more interested and less likely to get off task.

o How does this lesson connect with and build on the previous lessons?

This is the second part of the review for the Mid-Year Benchmark Oral Interviews. While students are always engaging in

the target language, these two days are specific to using the target language to earn points for the Benchmark assessment; in

their responses, the students must eliminate any English and form appropriate responses that answer the question. Since they

need to tailor their responses to the given assessment, I think it is important to familiarize the class with the format of the

assessment. This specifically builds on the previous lesson by using activities that the students already understand and/ or

already started the previous day. We’ll do a series of review games that focus on different topics (different lexical sets,

different grammar rules, etc). This allows the students to transition more seamlessly and focus on the content rather than any

organizational or logistical concerns that may have come up otherwise. For example, we can spend more time engaging in

content rather than reviewing instructions since the students have the appropriate background knowledge.

Central Focus

o What is the central focus for the content in the learning segment?

Students will be able to communicate verbally about a prompted topic (personal relationships and making plans) through a

six-exchange conversation with a fluent speaker.

Standards

o List state, national, and/or Common Core standards addressed in the lesson.

ACTFL World Readiness Standards for Learning Languages: Interpersonal Communication: Learners interact and negotiate

meaning in spoken, signed, or written conversations to share information, reactions, feelings, and opinions.

NYS LOTE Standards: Students can use appropriate strategies to initiate and engage in simple conversations with more

fluent or native speakers of the same age group, familiar adults, and providers of common public services.

Learning Objectives and Assessments

o List the specific content learning objectives for the lesson. What do I want my students to know, understand and do?

How will I assess these objectives?

Learning Objectives

Assessment Plan

Students will be able to verbally produce an

accurate six-exchange answer about a mock

scenario in preparation for the speaking assessment.

The assessment should still be formative here in order to properly

prepare students for the graded assessment that comes the following

two days. Formative assessments will mimic the previous day:

observations, written corrections on classwork, and verbal

affirmations.

Needs Work: Student will be able to create an appropriate response

through writing, but will not be able to relay his or her response

verbally.

On Target: Student will have a complete response after he or she has

prepared through writing or with notes.

Exemplary: Student will be able to spontaneously create an

appropriate response with moderate fluency.

To be considered appropriate, the response should answer the

question, be comprehensible, and use the vocabulary and the

grammar of a Level Three student.

Academic Language

o List the academic language function for this lesson.

Describe

Academic language demands

(e.g. vocabulary, syntax, discourse)

Instructional supports to help students use the language function and

address language demands.

Vocabulary: Since this is an assessment of their

ability to communicate, the demand for vocabulary

spans wider than the lexical sets of the current unit.

They will need to use their background knowledge

of a variety of verbs, transition words, etc in order

to expand on their ideas and produce thorough

responses. Nonetheless the most important

vocabulary is that of the following topics: personal

relations, descriptions, and making plans.

Syntax: Students are assessed on their ability to

make complete sentences and two sentences in a

row in order to deliver a complex and detailed

response.

The students all have access to a class copy of the textbook, an

online source called Quizlet that has flashcards and games, and a

printed packet for each unit. There is multiple means of

representation of the same material, which according to Universal

Design’s theory, creates a more inclusive and accommodating space

for all learners.

The gradual release of responsibility model allows students to

understand where their limits are and approach them in an

appropriate manner. It also allows the teachers to notice the specific

point in which the student becomes unable to meet the task. Then the

teacher can support through rephrasing, gestures, and providing

resources like dictionaries and notes.

Instructional Strategies and Learning Tasks (Procedures & Timelines)

o Launch/Hook—How will you start the lesson to engage and motivate students in learning?

Time

Instructional Strategies/Learning Tasks/Questions to

Ask

Rationale/Research & Theory

7 min

Introduction: “¿Qué hay de nuevo? ¿Qué vas a hacer

este fin de semana? ¿Tienes planes?”

Go over agenda for the day. Reminder that the formal

assessment is the next day. Take questions about the

oral interviews.

An informal conversation in the target language is

an appropriate start to a class for a variety of

reasons. It allots time for students to code-switch

and transition from English to Spanish. It also

allows teachers time to get to know their students,

which helps us create more meaningful lessons and

better understand our audience. It also is helpful to

teachers to look out for the wellbeing of their

students. More informal moments of class like this

are when we can pick up on the emotional needs of

our students. In addition, it is an appropriate start in

a foreign language classroom because it increases

input and the use of the target language. “Several

studies reported positive correlations between the

teacher’s use of the target language and students’

acquisition of the language, thus substantiating the

effectiveness of a teaching style in which use of the

first language is actively avoided” (Thompson,

322).

Each introduction starts with the presentation of a

slide that has the agenda and a Can-Do statement.

The latter mimics the Learning Objective of the

lesson in order to make the goal explicit for the

student and to encourage students to evaluate their

success based on communicative proficiency rather

that just grades. “Learners were told to monitor and

report on their strategy use and personal goals for

strategy development. The results of the strategy

training by Nunan showed that ‘learners began to

see language less an object to be studied than as a

tool to be used, began to reflect on how they

learned as much as what they learned....’” (Rahi, 8).

5 min

Think, Pair, Share: Students are asked to remind

themselves and tell their partner what they shared as

their strengths and weaknesses the previous day during

a class debrief. They are instructed to set a goal for the

period related to their success in the oral interview.

Similar to how the previous activity acts as a

transition space for students to code switch, this

acts as a directing and focusing activity to transition

into the goals of today. They are reminded of how

the lesson fits into the previous lesson and prepares

them for the assessment.

Think, Pair, Share is an effective strategy to

diversify the monotony of a lesson and encourage

bonds between students. “From the instructor

perspective, TPS has several advantages which

include 1) helpful in organizing content and

tracking students on where they are relative to the

topic being discussed in class, 2) allows students to

prepare for each class session, 3) saves instructor

time so that he/she can move to other topics, 4)

provides opportunities for students to interact with

each other and 5) helps the instructor in making the

class more interactive than regular lecture sessions”

(Radhakrishna, 84).

o Middle of the lesson—What will you do to engage students in developing understanding of the lesson objectives?

Time

Instructional Strategies/Learning Tasks/Questions to

Ask

Rationale/Research & Theory

13 min

“We’re going to begin our practice for the oral

interview. While you are doing this, keep your goal in

the back of your mind as a reminder of what mistakes

you made yesterday. Try not to make the same ones

today.” Use the Oral Interview PowerPoint to show the

mock scenarios again. Students choose the two they

have not started. Use tally sheets.

Promoting self-awareness and self-correction are

key elements in any classroom and especially in a

language classroom where students can develop

incorrect habits if the mistakes are not addressed

immediately and effectively.

From my experiences, when I am using a

PowerPoint without engaging my students directly,

students tend to pay less attention. I think it is

important to check and support their understanding.

Whether speaking in English or in Spanish, teacher

always uses gestures and visual cues to support

listening comprehension. Mueller’s experiment

demonstrated “the beneficial effects of visual aids

in the foreign language classroom” (Mueller, 340).

Visual aids are more beneficial when they are

integrated into the lesson in a way that is natural

and related to the topic. “Appropriate contextual

visuals can enhance listening comprehension

recall” (Mueller, 340). For this situation, I use my

hands to point out key words, to gather attention of

the students, or to act out a Spanish vocabulary

word that students do not understand.

5 min

Teachers give an example of a high quality interview

by modeling between student teacher and teacher.

“What makes this strong?” Remind students of how

they will be graded.

Modeling a conversation provides students with a

concrete example of a high-scoring product. They

will be able to imitate certain aspects of the

conversation after seeing this demonstration. It is

also important that they have a strong grasp on how

they are being graded, so they know how to focus

their efforts in order to score well.

5 min

Attempt #2: “Ahora, van a hacer la misma situación de

nuevo.” ‘Now, you guys are going to do the same

situation again.’ Try to take into account the points we

just made. Make the same oral interview stronger by

fixing your grammatical errors, giving more detail, and

following all guidelines.”

Students may be aware of some of the errors they

made while speaking, but will not be inclined to go

over the interview to correct themselves without

prompting. Self-correction is a crucial skill to

learning a language and developing proficiency.

This is called meta-cognitive learning.

“Metacognition refers to one's knowledge

concerning one's own cognitive processes or

anything related to them, e.g., the learning-relevant

properties of information or data” (Flavell, 1979).

o Closing the lesson—How will you end the lesson?

Time

Instructional Strategies/Learning Tasks/Questions to

Ask

Rationale/Research & Theory

8 min

Individualized study plans: “Think back to the goal you

set for the day. Did you complete it? Raise your hand if

you did. Raise your hand if you didn’t. What are some

resources you can use if you are still struggling or did

not complete the goal?”

These questions ask students to reflect on their

progress and readiness for the assessment. Rather

than leaving them without a plan if they are still

struggling, we will discuss ways they can study

independently.

Materials and Resources

o List and attach the handouts, notes, books, and other materials you will need for the lesson.

Mid-Year Benchmark PowerPoint

Differentiation/Planned Support For Students

o How will you support students with gaps in the prior knowledge that is necessary to be successful in this lesson?

o Most directions will be given in English or presented on a slide in English. This is to accommodate students who do not

have the listening skills in Spanish to completely grasp a set of instructions. Since it is so important that they are

followed properly, it can be beneficial to use the L1 in these situations. I also will often say phrases in both Spanish and

English to maintain a high level of target language input in the classroom. Another way to use Spanish in the classroom

without alienating the low proficiency students is to use gestures and visual cues, which I do in almost all situations.

o Strategies for responding to individual students or groups of students with similar learning styles, needs, IEPs or 504,

ELL. What alternative approaches do you have to content for these students?

o The native speakers are a challenging group to organize for an activity like this because they feel no need to prepare for

a speaking exam since Spanish is their native language. It is important to frame the Oral Interview as a test of academic

speaking. The assessment does not just ask about the ability to communicate, but also it examines a student’s ability to

make a point and defend it, create a detailed story, and/ or follow directions.

o Certain students will be hesitant to produce Spanish publicly and will need the reassurance that their privacy is

respected. For this reason, the assessments will be in private settings where the student and teacher are one-on-one. In

other words, they are not being assessed on their ability to publicly speak, but to communicate a message. Even with

this secure environment, there is no doubt that the students will be anxious. As I mentioned earlier, I have not only seen

this trend in my own students, but I have referenced literature that confirms the difficulty for language learners to

spontaneously produce Spanish orally. I must create a supportive and nurturing environment for my students to

promote a healthy well being, but also to get an accurate measurement of their abilities since the anxiety could affect

their scores. The high-stress and fear of my students could be “serious impediments to the development of second

language fluency as well as to performance” (Horwitz, 127).

o Strategies for responding to common errors and misunderstandings. What alternative approaches do you have to

content if you need it?

o The common error will be avoidance, a term that in layman terms means “to play it safe,” by using Level 1 or 2

vocabulary instead of engaging in the more recent and more advanced content. Students tend to give one-word answers

or simply not use the vocabulary by saying common phrases like, “Está bien” (It’s okay). To prompt more elaborate

and comprehensive answers, why I broke up each prompt with leading questions that are more specific than the original

situation outlines. I will have to remind them that they are required to be detailed for the interview, which is why we are

reviewing what elements are graded and how. The previous day, to avoid the problem of avoidance, we generated a

word web with examples of strong answers. The mock interview fulfills the same goal of training students to give

detailed answers that are representative of a Level Three student.

2.1.2 Site Supervisor Observation Report

Student Teacher

Jasmyn Chacko

Cooperating Teacher

Date of Observation

2/16/17

Observer Name and Role

Period or Block (minutes)

2 - 45 minutes

Grade Level & Class Title

SPA 3

Planning the Lesson

Very

Effective

Somewhat

Effective

Area for

Growth

Plans were submitted in a timely fashion

States central focus clearly

Plans activities to support learning

objectives

Addresses prior learning and prerequisite

skills related to central focus

Addresses personal/cultural/community

assets related to central focus

Plans supports for varied student learning

needs (students with IEPs, ELLs, students

with gaps in prior knowledge, and/or

students needing greater challenge)

Plans formal and informal assessments of

students’ content understanding

Makes assessment adaptations

Plans instructional supports to help

students understand and use academic

language

Addresses the Common Core Standards in

Spanish

Addresses procedural fluency

Addresses conceptual understanding

Teaching the Lesson

Launch/Hook

Very

Effective

Somewhat

Effective

Area for

Growth

Gains students’ attention

Establishes clear purposes

The Middle of the Lesson

Very

Effective

Somewhat

Effective

Area for

Growth

Engages students in developing

understanding of the content

Uses high quality questions to deepen

students’ understanding

Engages students in discussion

Elicits and builds on student responses to

promote thinking and develop

understanding of content

Supports students in using language to

develop understanding of content

Employs suitable pacing in the lesson

Monitors student understanding

Provides feedback to guide further learning

Links instruction to students’ prior learning

and personal, cultural and community

assets

Supports varied student learning needs

Supports students in using academic

language

Supports students in using higher-level

thinking

Closing the lesson

Very

Effective

Somewhat

Effective

Area for

Growth

Focuses student attention on the central

focus of the lesson

Gathers evidence of student learning

Gives follow-up assignments

Promoting a Positive Learning Environment

Very

Effective

Somewhat

Effective

Area for

Growth

Communicates clear expectations

about behavior

Distributes materials efficiently

Avoids unnecessary delays,

interruptions, and digressions

Manages efficient transitions

Very

Effective

Somewhat

Effective

Area for

Growth

Provides clear directions

Promotes on-task student behavior

Monitors behavior throughout the room

Intervenes appropriately when students

are off-task and non-disruptive

Intervenes appropriately when students are

off-task and disruptive to the learning of

others

Demonstrates rapport with and respect for

students

Establishes a challenging positive, low-risk

social environment that promotes mutual

respect among students

Comments on lesson by student teacher (What worked? What didn’t? For whom?

What changes would you make to better support student learning?):

Jasmyn was not completely satisfied with how the lesson went. Jasmyn felt that

because she was out sick the day prior to the observation, she let her nerves get to

her. I did not note this in her lesson delivery. Even though she felt there were some

grammatical errors in the opening of the lesson, she pushed on and was pleased with

some parts of the lesson. She felt that her conversations with students, both in whole

group and individually, showed signs of the beginning of a strong rapport. A

student approached her, independently and one on one, to ask for advice about an

application for an internship that she was applying to. Throughout the lesson,

Jasmyn used her knowledge of the students' interests to direct her examples.

Something Jasmyn would like to improve upon is engaging the students. The

students are accustomed to using their phones throughout class and Jasmyn hopes

to assert more control over this behavior in the future.

Brief summary of lesson by observer:

Students were preparing for a speaking assessment. Jasmyn led them in an activity

that created a word web which helped the students establish vocabulary from which

to base their assessment. After reviewing the vocabulary they already know, she

directed them to a page in the text with supplemental vocabulary that they could

utilize. They then worked in groups to write a 12 line dialogue.

Comments on the strengths of this lesson:

Jasmyn did a great job leading the vocabulary brainstorming and she circulated

while they were working in small groups. She offered them feedback when students

were confused on a vocabulary term, walking them back to the basic difference of

'el' and 'la' in Spanish so that the student could come up with the correct answer on

her own. Also, when a student asked for clarification on a verb conjugation, there

was a bit of confusion as to the correct formation of the verb, but Jasmyn

encouraged the student by saying, "Good for you for challenging me, see, I am

learning, too!" She also encouraged students when they auto-corrected themselves,

a sign that the student is internalizing the language. She has established a good

rapport with the students.

Comments on areas of needed improvement:

The students were a low energy group, so not all students participated in the

vocabulary brainstrorming activity. The class only had 10 students in it and one

was on her phone during much of that activity. Engaging all students is a challenge,

but I think that is something Jasmyn is working towards.

Do you judge this candidate to have:

exceeded expectations in this lesson?

met expectations in this lesson?

met most (but not all) expectations in this lesson?

failed to meet most expectations in this lesson?

2.1.3 Self-Reflection

Journal Entry: February 16

In general, I was not completely satisfied with how the lesson went. I knew that

with the previous day home sick, I was not quite mentally prepared. I let my nerves get to

me because I was already off. This led me to start the lesson interacting with the students

in a way that was a bit tense and riddled with grammatical errors in the target language. I

pushed on and was pleased that there were some successes in the lesson. My

conversations with students, both in whole group and individually, showed signs of the

beginning of a strong rapport that I am working on developing. I have not been there long

enough to expect full bonds to have been made, but I am happy with the progress. Gina

even approached me, independently and one on one, to ask me for advice about an

application for an internship that she was applying to. Specific to this lesson, I used my

knowledge of the students' interests to direct my examples. My professor Amanda Brown

emphasized this tactic to me during her instruction of Communicative Language

Teaching. One thing that I would like to improve is that these students are very distracted

and disengaged. They are accustomed to using their phones throughout class. I hope to

assert more control over this behavior in the future.

My greatest weakness is my reliance on English. In the lesson plans and

classroom materials, you can see that instructions are almost all given in English. In my

Methods class with Professor Emma Ticio, I am encouraged by her and by our readings

to minimize the use of the L1 in the classroom. Research around second language

acquisition often concludes that a lesson taught entirely in the target language is

significantly more effective than the alternative. Specifically, we looked at the value of

input during the methods class. Input is any information, in writing, orally, or otherwise,

in the target language that could be understood or useful to the student.

The biggest mistake I made with this lesson plan was that I created it for two

periods; in other words, it would last for two days before we began the summative

assessment. There are many aspects of this that proved problematic once I actually taught

the lessons. After the first day, I already knew I had incorrectly estimated the time. We

had only gone through the first half of the first lesson! The students’ nerves were

palpable and they became visually distressed when they heard the words “speaking

practice” or “mid-year benchmark.” I reminisced on the early stages of my Spanish

development and remembered feeling the same exact way. In my experiences, it seems

speaking is the almost always the last skill, out of reading, writing, listening, and

speaking, for non-native speakers to develop and produce with confidence. This is due to

many factors including the heightened affective filter during oral production and the fact

that it’s often the least practiced in classrooms. Despite the rise in a focus on

communicative proficiency, which most likely stems from the rise of the approach of

Communicative Language Teaching, the reality is that many classes are giving minimal

preparation and practice of spontaneous speech, pronunciation, and other skills associated

with oral production.

Seeing the stress in my students and hearing their audible groans, I was quickly

reminded of this gap between the frequency of practicing oral exams and the value it has

in real-world contexts. I do feel that the students underestimate their ability; they speak in

Spanish quite often during our class activities. Nonetheless, the rigor of this task lies in

the length, fluidity, and cohesion of a conversation. During class activities, students

generally produce one to two sentences at a time. Occasionally, there will be follow-up

questions or prompts directed by the teacher that will turn their participation more

conversational. In these cases, their follow-up answers tend to have less grammatical

accuracy and a slower place than their original contribution. This is a sign that they had

been preparing their original answer beforehand, not spontaneously, a habit that is

common amongst this level. With this realization that they struggle with spontaneous

production and have had limited practice, it makes sense that they would need more than

two class periods to prepare. I should have allotted three periods for preparation and I

should have designed one activity focused on stress-reduction. Before other tasks, we

have had more formal and planned ways to reduce stress and boost confidence, but my

lesson lacked this important piece.

Today I received one of the hardest criticisms from my host teacher. I was doing

the introduction for the day. It is a time allotted to allow students to speak on a topic of

their choice, usually what they did the night before or what they are looking forward to in

the upcoming week. During this time, I call on students on a volunteer basis to share in

the target language, Spanish. A common issue is that students will want to share without

speaking in Spanish. The issue today was with my reaction to this matter and how my

reaction differed by student. One of the hardest things to do coming into this profession is

to recognize one’s own biases. These prejudices permeate the classroom, no matter how

minor or subconscious they are. I found myself acting on such biases rather than relying

on my training and more open mind. Kyla and David had both attempted to share in

English, and I politely said, “Try in Spanish.” Zach was next. He is a student with an IEP

that classifies him on the autism scale. I called on his raised hand. He asked, “I don’t

know how to say it in Spanish,” a habit that was similar to the two students before him. I

said, “You can say it in English.” At the moment, my first conscious thought was that I

was pleased he was participating since he could often be so quiet. He shared his response

and I moved on to the rest of the lesson without thinking much of the interaction.

During the subsequent planning, my teacher had a collection of post-it of notes to

give to me as constructive criticism of my work. There were some minor things and then

she began to speak of this interaction. She was not accusatory or impatient, but forward

in her critique of my actions. I had presumed incompetence and allowed a student to

follow a lower standard than the other students based on my own subconscious bias that

he would not be able to complete the task or that he would struggle too much while doing

so. My immediate reaction when my host teacher brought this to my attention was shame

and embarrassment. This action did not reflect the type of teacher, and person, I wanted

to be. I felt I had overestimated by inclusivity, which is something I hold close to my

heart. Thankfully my host teacher handled the conversation in a way that was

understanding and came from the desire to help rather than the temptation to judge. She

did not condemn me, rather she explained her own instances with similar preconceived

notions and she reminded me that being aware was the very first step.

The very next day, I was determined to have a redeeming interaction with Zach. I

made sure to spend more time asking him to engage in Spanish, rather than providing him

the out to immediately switch to English. I thought back to my Special Education class

and realized how I had not followed the guidelines set out by my professor. I began to

provide supports, so Zach could reach the same levels as other students; this was a shift

from the previous day, where I had removed the standard for the purpose of sheltering

Zach from peers’ snickers and the possibility of failure. These assumptions were

lowering the level of mastery that Zach was expected to meet and therefore would meet.

2.2 Lesson Plan #2: Llamadas Telefónicas ‘Telephone Calls’

2.2.1 Lesson Plan

Name

Jasmyn Chacko

Lesson Title

Llamadas Telefónicas

Date (including day of week)

Monday, March 6

Grade Level & Class Title

Level Three

Period or Block (# of minutes)

2, 4/5, 10

Instructional Context

o What do I know about my students that will inform this lesson? Are there any particular student strengths, interests,

background, needs related to the lesson?

The students tend to engage more when placed into pairs. They can be hesitant to speak in Spanish in big group settings,

which is typical for this age group and proficiency level (especially with the presence of native speakers in the classroom).

From past lessons, I have observed that even the more shy or uninterested students will speak during paired activities. I

attribute this not only to the lower affective filter of small group work, but also that the classes in themselves are small with

about 10-14 students. This has allowed the group to develop stronger relationships with their peers. Another benefit of pair

work is that it has been built into this specific classroom. Señora Perez set up “clock partners” for each day of the week

(minus Friday which is a day of choice) that has been used at least once every week since September. Creating this habit

early is important to classroom management.

o How does this lesson connect with and build on the previous lessons?

Last week we began the topic: phone calls. As a hook, we captured student interest by introducing Spanish SMS

abbreviations and allowing students to text each other in Spanish. We used this as a jumping off point to transition to phone

calls and the terminology used to talk about them and answer them. They first received the vocabulary on Friday. Now they

must integrate the new vocabulary into their ever-growing Spanish vocabulary. In order to support this cognitive process,

we must use drills and other practice activities.

Central Focus

o What is the central focus for the content in the learning segment?

Students will learn to communicate in the medium of telephones rather than face-to-face.

Standards

o List state, national, and/or Common Core standards addressed in the lesson.

ACTFL World-Readiness Standards: Interpretive Communication: Learners understand, interpret, and analyze what is

heard, read, or viewed on a variety of topics.

Learning Objectives and Assessments

o List the specific content learning objectives for the lesson. What do I want my students to know, understand and do?

How will I assess these objectives?

Learning Objectives

Assessment Plan

Students will be able to answer questions based on

information they read or hear using new vocabulary.

This Can-Do statement comes from ACTFL’s World Readiness

Guidelines. The textbook activities are direct ways to assess their

listening comprehension and mastery of vocabulary. Students’

answers to these questions will be explicit indicators of their ability.

Needs Work: less than 50% correct answers

On Target: 50%-70% correct answers

Exemplary: 70%+ correct answers

Academic Language

o List the academic language function for this lesson.

Identify

Academic language demands

(e.g. vocabulary, syntax, discourse)

Instructional supports to help students use the language function and

address language demands.

Vocabulary: There are 22 words/ phrases in this

Desafío.

We will remove syntax demands that come with learning phrases

since they will be learning the phrases without the expectation of

understanding the full linguistic connection within the phrase. For

example, “quedarse sin batería” is one of the phrases. They will be

expected to identify/ translate it, utilize it in a sentence, and

conjugate the verb. However they do not need to understand the

implications of “se” or the preposition “sin”. This is an appropriate

way for students to reactive the cognitive processes of acquiring an

L1 in order to acquire a L2 according to the Universalist Model

theory.

Instructional Strategies and Learning Tasks (Procedures & Timelines)

o Launch/Hook—How will you start the lesson to engage and motivate students in learning?

Time

Instructional Strategies/Learning Tasks/Questions to

Ask

Rationale/Research & Theory

5 min

Read Agenda/ Introductions: Every day we go over the

agenda for the day (including any upcoming

assessments or important events) and discuss the big

question of the learning segment. We also allow for a

few minutes of teacher-guided conversation in the

target language as a whole class. Possible questions

include: “¿Qué tal tu fin de semana? ¿Qué hiciste?”

When acquiring an L2, speech production is one of

the most effective ways to do so because it requires

students to draw on a wide range of background

knowledge and is higher on Bloom’s Taxonomy

because it pushes recall to combine with higher

level thinking such as authoring and applying.

These students are traveling from class to class and

a certain amount of transition time is expected, but

it must be controlled to avoid wasting time that

could be valuable time to learn. “Past studies also

confirmed that well-managed transitions have the

potential to increase academic learning time

throughout the day (Campbell & Skinner,

2004)....If teachers control the time students spend

transitioning from one academic activity to the next

{they will} have the ability to increase learning

time” (Guardino, 211). I not only limit this time by

having a certain number of minutes maximum that

are allotted for the transition, but I also strive to

make it a productive time by speaking in the target

language and encouraging students to use the target

language as well. I encourage students to produce

orally in the target language by recording how

many times they speak a day in Spanish. I write this

on a clipboard using tallies and this translates to a

weekly grade that falls under participation points.

10 min

Review homework: Students had pages 71-72 in their

workbook assigned as homework on Friday. We will

use this time to give credit in the grade book to those

who did the assignment and review the answers.

Students who attempted the entire worksheet receive

100 points for the assignment; it is the teacher’s

discretion to give points based on percentage

completed. During the debrief of the homework,

students and teacher will speak entirely in Spanish

(unless the teacher deems necessary to use English).

Instructions will be given as follows: “Abran los textos

a página setenta y uno. Vamos a repasar la tarea.”

(Open your books. The teacher will record participation

points on the weekly grade sheet on the clipboard.

Answers will be prompted with the following question:

“¿Quién tiene la respuesta para número (#)?” (Who has

the answer for number (#)?)

This step assures and promotes accountability of

students and acts as an informal diagnostic for the

teacher to measure students’ mastery of the

objective. By looking at which answers they had

wrong, the teacher better understands the gaps in

understanding.

o Middle of the lesson—What will you do to engage students in developing understanding of the lesson objectives?

Time

Instructional Strategies/Learning Tasks/Questions to

Ask

Rationale/Research & Theory

6 min

Vocabulary Practice: Draw and Write

Students will keep the workbook page open, which has

a glossary of words for this topic. They will be asked to

choose words they find particularly challenging for this

activity that requires them to draw vocabulary and

write sentences based on directions presented by the

PPT.

Vocabulary review paired with drawing is shown to

increase frequency of recall due to the way it

provides multiple means of representation.

15 min

Pg 98 #63-64 in the textbook

Students read the situation (a written conversation in

the textbook related to phone calls and events) aloud.

Complete the following activities with “parejas de las

doce” (clock partners for Monday) using markers on

the desk or pen/ paper. We will review the activities

after about 10 minutes. Teacher calls on students.

The previous activity uses the vocabulary out of

context of a sentence, so it does not take into

account a student’s ability to apply the knowledge

and also incorporate syntactic information. For this

reason, this time is allotted to practicing these skills

that challenges students within the zone of proximal

development to do more than recall.

7 min

Pg 98 #65: Audio Activity. Students will work

individually for this activity, which is a listening

comprehension practice using the target vocabulary.

Teacher says, “¿Otra vez?” and repeats the audio.

L2 learners may be able to recognize a word in the

target language when it is written, especially if it is

a cognate, but may not be able to recognize it when

it is spoken.

o Closing the lesson—How will you end the lesson?

Time

Instructional Strategies/Learning Tasks/Questions to

Ask

Rationale/Research & Theory

5 min

Pg 107 #83: Phone Etiquette and Preferences Think

Pair Share. The textbook activity, a series of questions

regarding the student’s preferences and opinion on

etiquette, suggests students do this as pairs, but I would

like them to share their thoughts as well.

This is a nice way to wrap up the lesson and bring it

back to some of the themes we have been talking

about throughout this lesson segment: cultural

differences and personal preferences/ habits

regarding communication. It is also a way to have

students spontaneously and verbally produce in the

target language with the proper supports in place.

Materials and Resources

o List and attach the handouts, notes, books, and other materials you will need for the lesson.

Daily Agenda PPT, Vocabulary Review Slides, Markers, Textbooks, Workbooks

Differentiation/Planned Support For Students

o How will you support students with gaps in the prior knowledge that is necessary to be successful in this lesson?

Each step of the lesson is graduated to provide the support to those students who take longer to master new vocabulary, but

for greater gaps in prior knowledge I will make sure the right resources are available to students. They have the same

vocabulary list in three different locations (textbook, workbook, and individuals word charts each made) which they will

have full access to during this lesson.

o Strategies for responding to individual students or groups of students with similar learning styles, needs, IEPs or 504,

ELL. What alternative approaches do you have to content for these students?

Focus student John will need extra check-ins for comprehension and emotional stabilization. In past lessons I have noticed

that he can become a bit frazzled or stressed when he feels he is not meeting his potential. He has specifically explained to

me that he has trouble describing things and/ or being creative/ imaginative. For the majority of the lesson, this should not

be an issue, but he may become tense and shut down during the drawing portion of the vocabulary review. I plan on using

proximity and verbal check-ins to keep on top of this potential issue.

Students who struggle to stay on task may struggle with this lesson since it involves a lot of textbook work. Thankfully, it is

a habit they are accustomed to since we often have days like these.

o Strategies for responding to common errors and misunderstandings. What alternative approaches do you have to

content if you need it?

A common misunderstanding during vocabulary lessons is that memorization is enough. Students believe the task is to

memorize a list and will feel they have completed the task once they can recall the words from Spanish to English. “In

researching students’ beliefs about the traditional rote memory vocabulary strategy...they described rote learning as ‘one of

the most important subcategories of mnemonic strategies’ (Rashidi & Omid, 2011, p. 140)” (Carvalho, 28). As teachers we

know that they need to be able to switch back and forth between the L1 and L2 and that recall is not enough. They need to

conjugate the verb phrases and use these words in higher level thinking activities in culturally appropriate ways.

2.2.2 Site Supervisor Observation Report

Student Teacher

Jasmyn Chacko

Cooperating Teacher

Date of Observation

3/6/17

Observer Name and Role

Period or Block (minutes)

4 - 45 minutes

Grade Level & Class Title

SPA 3

Planning the Lesson

Very

Effective

Somewhat

Effective

Area for

Growth

Plans were submitted in a timely fashion

States central focus clearly

Plans activities to support learning

objectives

Addresses prior learning and prerequisite

skills related to central focus

Addresses personal/cultural/community

assets related to central focus

Plans supports for varied student learning

needs (students with IEPs, ELLs, students

with gaps in prior knowledge, and/or

students needing greater challenge)

Plans formal and informal assessments of

students’ content understanding

Makes assessment adaptations

Plans instructional supports to help

students understand and use academic

language

Addresses the Common Core Standards in

Spanish

Addresses procedural fluency

Addresses conceptual understanding

Teaching the Lesson

Launch/Hook

Very

Effective

Somewhat

Effective

Area for

Growth

Gains students’ attention

Establishes clear purposes

The Middle of the Lesson

Very

Effective

Somewhat

Effective

Area for

Growth

Engages students in developing

understanding of the content

Uses high quality questions to deepen

students’ understanding

Engages students in discussion

Elicits and builds on student responses to

promote thinking and develop

understanding of content

Supports students in using language to

develop understanding of content

The Middle of the Lesson

Very

Effective

Somewhat

Effective

Area for

Growth

Employs suitable pacing in the lesson

Monitors student understanding

Provides feedback to guide further learning

Links instruction to students’ prior learning

and personal, cultural and community

assets

Supports varied student learning needs

Supports students in using academic

language

Supports students in using higher-level

thinking

Closing the lesson

Very

Effective

Somewhat

Effective

Area for

Growth

Focuses student attention on the central

focus of the lesson

Gathers evidence of student learning

Gives follow-up assignments

Promoting a Positive Learning Environment

Very

Effective

Somewhat

Effective

Area for

Growth

Communicates clear expectations

about behavior

Distributes materials efficiently

Avoids unnecessary delays,

interruptions, and digressions

Manages efficient transitions

Provides clear directions

Promotes on-task student behavior

Monitors behavior throughout the room

Intervenes appropriately when students

are off-task and non-disruptive

Intervenes appropriately when students are

off-task and disruptive to the learning of

others

Demonstrates rapport with and respect for

students

Establishes a challenging positive, low-risk

social environment that promotes mutual

respect among students

Comments on lesson by student teacher (What worked? What didn’t? For whom?

What changes would you make to better support student learning?):

Jasmy thought that the class was very distracted she felt that she struggled to keep

them on task. For example, (in general) the students use their phones frequently and

talk a lot in side conversations. Jasmyn and Diana are working on a way to address

this lack of focus.

Jasmyn feels that her ability to engage students is one of her stregths and often

shares her struggles in learning Spanish with her students to demonstrate that it can

be hard, but they can succeed. Jasmyn was satisfied with her student feedback and

interaction, but would like to have improved the flow of the day by minimizing

transition time.

Brief summary of lesson by observer:

Today's lesson was centered around being able to communicate in a phone

conversation. She had the Big question, Essential question and the Do it now as well

as the Ticket out the door posted on a slide when students arrived. Students

reviewed homework, did vocabulary practice and activities together in small groups

and reviewed the answers as a class. The class was small, only 9 students, so she was

able to elicit responses from each student.

Jasmyn closed the lesson by assigning homework and leting students know that they

will continue to go over this material in the coming days.

Comments on the strengths of this lesson:

Jasmyn connected with students at the beginning of the period, talking about what

the students did over the weekend. She praised self correction (as it demonstrates

students are internalizing the material) and addresed grammatical issues as they

arose. For example, when students had a difficult time conjugating a reflexive verb,

Jasmyn took a moment to pause and review the use and correct formation of the

verb "quedarse". Jasmyn also provided feedback to the students' writing and

circulated around the room to answer any questions or to help keep students on

task.

Two students are native speakers of the language and were independently working

on writing pieces. This is one downfall of the program is that in order to graduate

with an advanced diploma, they need to take certain levels of Spanish despite their

fluency in the language.

Comments on areas of needed improvement:

The lesson could have been tighter, with students more focused and using the target

language. Once students get more confident with the vocabulary, they could do

more interactive, communicative activities. But, this lesson was creating that base

from which to grow.

One suggestion I would make for improving pronunciation is to have the students

practice the dialogues in pairs. Then play the audio with the correct pronunciation

and have students repeat the proper pronunciation. This way, they get to rehearse

it on their own first, hear it done well and then practice the proper pronunciation.

Do you judge this candidate to have:

exceeded expectations in this lesson?

met expectations in this lesson?

met most (but not all) expectations in this lesson?

failed to meet most expectations in this lesson?

2.2.3 Self-Reflection

Journal Entry: March 6

The class was very distracted today and I struggled to keep them on task. The

class as a whole struggles with discipline and it can be a difficult environment to enter as

a new teacher who feels less confident in her classroom management abilities. The

students use their phones frequently and talk a lot in side conversations. I haven't

witnessed many consequences for these actions, but my host teacher and I have started a

great dialogue about classroom management and she typed me up a potential script to use

for certain situations. Classroom management was one of the issues that I had already

foreseen before beginning at this field placement. It was not necessarily the urban

environment that made me feel this way, rather the proximity in age that I felt would give

me less authority and credit. Thankfully, I can sometimes use my youth to my benefit.

For example, in today's lesson, I often made myself vulnerable and was honest about my

imperfections. I find students respond well to this and possibly are even more receptive to

me than to Señora due to the students’ perception of age. As a college student, they find

me relatable and my struggles in Spanish have more believability as I am still a student

and not fully a teacher.

Going back to the topic of their engagement, as distracted as they were, there

were many volunteers to participate. There were many open and engaged students. One

success of the lesson was the way I gave feedback and interacted with the students, but I

would have improved the flow of the day and minimize transitions.

In my host teacher’s observation of my teaching, there was one additional topic of

concern. Especially in particular classes, there are one or two students that dominate the

entire conversation. They are the students that raise their hands when no one else will, the

students who always get high participation points, and whose grasp of the content is

strong. After my first period teaching on this particular day, my host teacher reminded me

the value of wait time. She had noticed that I would call on a student very quickly; the

hands that are up the quickest are usually those students who always answer. She gave

me this reminder early on in the day so that I could put it into practice for the rest of the

day. I tried it out with mixed success. In some classes, it went as planned and there was a

wider range of participation. It did not always have that result though. In some cases, the

wait time would not have any effect and the same two hands just were up longer. To this,

my teacher suggested saying, “Someone new today!” or “Remember that participation

points are a big part of your grade!” Without wait time or further prompting, the same

few students would be the only ones practicing oral production in the target language. A

wide range of participants is also valuable to the teacher to give him or her a more

accurate sense of the abilities and understanding of all of the students, not just some.

2.3 Lesson Plan #3: Plan a Trip Project Introduction

2.3.1 Lesson Plan

Name

Jasmyn Chacko

Lesson Title

Plan a Trip Project Introduction

Date (including day of week)

Friday, March 31

Grade Level & Class Title

Level 3 Spanish

Period or Block (# of minutes)

2, 4/5, 10

Instructional Context

o What do I know about my students that will inform this lesson? Are there any particular student strengths, interests,

background, needs related to the lesson?

The learning segment prior to this lesson was a review of the travel vocabulary that the students should have learned in

levels one and two. This is the first mini-unit out of many that will occur before the final exam as a review of past topics

that have a large presence on the exam despite the fact that they are not in the Level 3 curriculum. My host teacher and I

reviewed the exam for trends in topics, and I designed my lessons to highlight the skills and information that will be

assessed in June. Due to the fact that the lessons require the students to tap into background knowledge, my approach will

be different than what it would be if I were to present new information. My pacing will be a bit faster than normal and my

preliminary activities will be characterized less by scaffolding and more by diagnostic activities. These preliminary

activities make up the first portion of the lesson, which is often called the lesson warm-up. “In this warm-up stage the

learners’ background knowledge is tapped and their interest is aroused...” (Brinton 340).

This particular lesson segment surrounds a task-based project. I made the instructional choice of replacing a traditional

exam with a task-based project because the task-based project would draw on a wider range of background knowledge and

would require students to draw connections between different units. This argument is supported by research on task-based

learning for second language acquisition; researchers “argue that communicative engagement in tasks provides the

necessary and sufficient condition for second language acquisition. In other words, there is no point in focusing on linguistic

form because communicative engagement provides the necessary and sufficient condition for language acquisition” (Nunan,

460). A traditional exam often does not complete this type of higher-level thinking and instead requires more recall.

I felt a task-based project instead of a traditional exam also had the benefit of appealing to students with less traditional

learning styles. There was little variation in the format of the assessments that my host teacher and I gave; we always gave

quizzes and exams in their traditional style. I wanted to explore an alternative because I had learned in my Special

Education class that diversifying assessments allowed success to be accessible for all learners. Specifically, my Special

Education class introduced me to Universal Design (UD). “Universal Design for Learning is a set of principles for

curriculum development that give all individuals equal opportunities to learn. UDL provides a blueprint for creating

instructional goals, methods, materials, and assessments that work for everyone – not a single, one-size-fits-all solution but

rather flexible approaches that can be customized and adjusted for individual needs” (UDL Center, 2017). Traditional tests

are not flexible or fitting for all types of students. An appropriate assessment under UD guidelines provides students with

choices of how they will engage, express, and learn.

o How does this lesson connect with and build on the previous lessons?

As previously mentioned, this lesson follows a formal review of the target vocabulary. The students had four days of lessons

and practice with the vocabulary. They also will receive an assessment, a vocabulary quiz, on Thursday, the day before this

lesson. The quiz requires basic recall for it is a series of translations from Spanish to English. According to Bloom’s

Taxonomy, recall is not a high level of thinking and we should push our students to reach higher levels of thinking within

the same content. In order to create this challenge, I am facilitating a project that is task-based. The task is to plan a trip for

the class. Task-based learning may increase rigor and keeping the class in the target language because it requires

collaboration of a variety of skills and moves the lessons away from a focus on form. Nunan supports this claim in his

connection between task-based learning to real-world obstacles; he draws on examples such as finding a home or making an

appointment (463). This concept demonstrates the ability of task-based learning to surpass language development and guide

the student to develop other skills as well. “Tasks involve language and cognitive development but go a step further, aiming

at the development of the whole learner and using foreign language learning as a vehicle. Language learning thus transcends

the utilitarian development of skills for communicating and becomes a truly educational endeavor” (Nunan, 464).

This lesson builds on future lessons by providing the introduction to the work they will do in the computer lab on Monday

and Tuesday. Without a proper explanation of the requirements and format of the project, their time in the computer lab

would be spent asking questions or not knowing where to start. This time is also used to provide scaffolding to avoid

confusion and to lower the affective filter.

Central Focus

o What is the central focus for the content in the learning segment?

The students will be able to write out the details of a hypothetical trip including transportation, activities, dates, and lodging.

Standards

o List state, national, and/or Common Core standards addressed in the lesson.

ACTFL World-Readiness Standards: Interpretive Communication: Learners understand, interpret, and analyze what is

heard, read, or viewed on a variety of topics.

NYS LOTE: draw on a wide range of language forms, vocabulary, idioms, and structures learned in class as well as those

acquired through independent exposure to the language.

Learning Objectives and Assessments

o List the specific content learning objectives for the lesson. What do I want my students to know, understand and do?

How will I assess these objectives?

Learning Objectives

Assessment Plan

Students will be able to identify the elements of the

project and use that checklist to critique a completed

project.

We will go over the weaknesses and strengths that the students

noticed about the example project.

Needs work: Student will inappropriately label a strength or

weakness; he or she will confuse the two or give an answer that is

unrelated. He or she will not be able to support his or her response.

On target: Student will give one or more correct answers.

Nonetheless he or she may only be able to support his or her

response with minimal evidence.

Exemplary: Student will give ample, relevant, accurate, and

concrete evidence and identify multiple strengths and weaknesses.

Academic Language

o List the academic language function for this lesson.

Identify, Evaluate

Academic language demands

(e.g. vocabulary, syntax, discourse)

Instructional supports to help students use the language function and

address language demands.

Discourse: Students will have to understand how to

use PowerPoint in order to create a slideshow

presentation for this task.

During the sessions in the computer lab, my host teacher and I will

be roaming to ensure that the technology aspect of the project is

running smoothly and to answer questions in a timely fashion. We

also have printed worksheets about how to put Spanish accents in

when typing for those who are not familiar with this process. These

later sessions will require other help as well; for example, we will

have to be very clear and give instructions on how to turn in the

project (electronically or not).

Instructional Strategies and Learning Tasks (Procedures & Timelines)

o Launch/Hook—How will you start the lesson to engage and motivate students in learning?

Time

Instructional Strategies/Learning Tasks/Questions to

Ask

Rationale/Research & Theory

5 min

Introduction and Agenda: Teacher asks students

questions informally in the target language. Teacher

proceeds to organize the class schedule by explaining

the order of the activities for the day and the learning

objectives.

These few minutes provide for transition time to

allow the students to code switch and to settle in.

There are logistical benefits to this as well for a

teacher surrounding classroom management and

recordkeeping. For example, the teacher also uses

this time to do attendance, collect old work, or hand

back work.

Additionally, by laying out the lesson objective in

the form of a “Can Do” statement, the teacher sets

the expectation for self assessment from the

students, by creating an atmosphere of

accountability and learner awareness. The phrase

“Can-Do” was coined by ACTFL and they list

appropriate Can-Do Statements for each

proficiency level, which I used as a guideline

during my lesson planning (ACTFL).

o Middle of the lesson—What will you do to engage students in developing understanding of the lesson objectives?

Time

Instructional Strategies/Learning Tasks/Questions to

Ask

Rationale/Research & Theory

10 min

Introduction to Project: Teacher hands out the

worksheet with the task and its requirements. The

teacher asks students to volunteer to read parts of the

task or cold calls students depending on the demand of

the day and student population. Teacher prompts to

students to raise their hands to volunteer to read or

answer questions with the following statement,

“Necesito un voluntario para leer.” ‘I need a volunteer

to read.’ Teacher checks in for understanding after each

section of the task.

To have multiple and frequent checks of

understanding is a modification specified by the

IEP of some students in my class. Plus it helps all

students regardless of classification.

Teacher uses “un voluntario” ‘a volunteer’ because

it is a cognate and it important for students to not

just have input, but input they can understand.

“Studies have found that simple exposure to the

language is not enough: students need to have

comprehensible input” (Thompson, 322).

Teacher should use positive framing to lower the

affective filter of the students, who will indubitably

have high stress levels due to the announcement of

an assessment and their fear of producing orally in

the target language. “The situation of speaking to

an audience is inherently anxiety-inducing because

of the possibility of unfavorable evaluation by the

audience, but that there are also individual

differences in audience sensitivity” (Price, 54).

Unfortunately, the anxiety targets those who

already have low self-esteem in the foreign

language classroom, perpetuating a cycle in which

the students who are already successful in the

classroom continue to be. Success should not be

this rigid, but the trend is that low confidence

students will only be more anxious to present. “Due

to any of a number of factors, such as low self-

esteem, past failure, etc., students may perceive

themselves to have little talent for learning a

foreign language, in which case they would be

likely to experience high anxiety in foreign

language classes” (Price, 59).

6 min

Rubric Review: Teacher tells students to open up to the

rubric (page two of packet) and has students look it

over. Teacher points out main points and the biggest

difference from their previous project, which is the

ability to get extra points.

This rubric is based on the writing composition’s

rubric that we completed last week. We spent a lot

of time on that rubric and evaluated a full project.

Since students have that background knowledge,

the pacing here can be faster. The teacher must

draw an explicit connection between the two

rubrics in order to do this. The one major difference

is the “Chispas” section, which has potential ways

to get extra points. “Chispas” which translates to

“Sparks” is a way to describe extra incentives or

extra points. This section says that the winner of the

Best Trip Competition or any student who goes

above and beyond can receive extra credit. Since

the students are not accustomed to an assessment in

this format (they are almost always given tests),

they need more time reviewing the rubric to

understand the assessment.

The explicit review of the rubric and the following

activity, a presentation of a completed project

example, are two ways in which I am scaffolding

the ‘Plan a Trip’ project for my students.

Scaffolding “refers to the temporary support

provided for the completion of a task that learners

otherwise might not be able to complete. This

support can be provided in a variety of manners”

(Janneke van de Pol, 272).

8 min

Completed Project Example: Teacher presents pre-

designed project to class. Students are told to evaluate

the project based on the rubric.

The teacher models correct behaviors and

exaggerates incorrect behaviors. Students use

inductive processing to differentiate between the

two and relate them to the rubric. Evaluation is

considered a high-level process according to

Bloom’s Taxonomy and increases the student’s

understanding of how to score well. Bloom’s

Taxonomy “has a central cognitive domain that

specifies a framework in which distinctive

cognitive learning activities are identified for each

of the six sequential stages through which the

acquisition of knowledge and skills takes place.

The six stages of learning that comprise the

cognitive domain of the taxonomy are: Knowledge,

Comprehension, Application, Analysis, Synthesis,

and Evaluation” (Ugur, 95). As seen here,

evaluation is at the highest level under this

framework.

o Closing the lesson—How will you end the lesson?

Time

Instructional Strategies/Learning Tasks/Questions to

Ask

Rationale/Research & Theory

15 min

Independent Research: Teacher asks students to open

up to their Cornell worksheet (third page in packet).

Students use laptops and their Cornell worksheets to

begin an outline for their projects. Students work

independently.

The Cornell worksheet is a graphic organizer that

provides scaffolding for the project. Before they

begin their independent work on the computer, I

want them to have a sense of direction.

Materials and Resources

o List and attach the handouts, notes, books, and other materials you will need for the lesson.

PowerPoint (Un Viaje a Madrid por Señorita Chacko), Prompt Packets (Prompt, Rubric, Cornell Worksheet), Laptops

Differentiation/Planned Support For Students

o How will you support students with gaps in the prior knowledge that is necessary to be successful in this lesson?

The major gap in prior knowledge that would affect this project is low proficiency with the lexical set of travel vocabulary

and the grammar topic of future tense. These are two areas I foresee will be problematic for some students. It is important to

remember that I am not assessing their ability to recall vocabulary from memory. They will have full access to their notes,

dictionaries, and the internet.

o Strategies for responding to individual students or groups of students with similar learning styles, needs, IEPs or 504,

ELL. What alternative approaches do you have to content for these students?

I will use the Universal Design Theory’s recommendation of providing multiple means of representation, especially for

instructions and for students with IEPs (UDL Center). I will implement this in my lesson by providing instructions both

orally and on the worksheet with the requirements. We will spend time going over this as a class to allow time for

clarifications and questions.

One group of students that will struggle with this learning segment is the group of students who are shyer and less

comfortable producing orally, especially if it is in Spanish. This group is not clearly identified like those with IEPs are, but I

have a familiarity with these students and their personalities from working with them for a few months. I, of course, can talk

to my host teacher as well to ask her for her insight into which students will be uncomfortable presenting in front of the

class. I have decided that students who have too much anxiety with the possibility of presenting will have the option to

present to a smaller group than the whole class. I am not explicitly giving that option in order to avoid students from opting

out of the whole group presentation simply from nerves. I want to challenge all students to be able to produce in the target

language in a group setting, but will make my best judgment on whether the presentation would not be in the student’s best

interests.

Another group of students that I need to be aware of during this learning segment, which will last about four to five days, is

the group of students who are less independent: students who struggle to stay on task when they are given freedom. Simple

prevention tactics to avoid behavior or focus issues include proximity and frequent redirection/ refocusing. More formally, I

will have editing sessions with each student at the start of the final lab session. This one-on-one time will make sure

students are on track and on schedule to finish by the due date, and will direct students who need more support. Since the

students will know ahead of time that their work will be reviewed once before the presentation, it also keeps students

accountable and more likely to stay on track as they do not know when they will be called upon for their editing session.

o Strategies for responding to common errors and misunderstandings. What alternative approaches do you have to

content if you need it?

A common misunderstanding for this project will be that the students should write full paragraphs on the slides, so that they

can read off of them for the presentation. I will approach this by presenting a completed slideshow first. I will draw

attention to the limited amount of text on each slide.

Another common error will be to answer the questions with very simple answers and not include details. The students

should be creative and thorough. For example, I foresee a student saying, Viajaremos en avión, which in English is “We

will travel by plane”, but a better response would be, Viajaremos en avión. Saldremos del aeropuerto de JFK y llegaremos al

aeropuerto de Barajas en Madrid – “We will travel by plan. We will leave from JFK airport and we will arrive at Barajas

airport in Madrid.”

2.3.2 Site Supervisor Report

Student Teacher

Jasmyn Chacko

Cooperating Teacher

Date of Observation

3/31/17

Observer Name and Role

Period or Block (minutes)

Grade Level & Class Title

SPA 3

Planning the Lesson

Very

Effective

Somewhat

Effective

Area for

Growth

Plans were submitted in a timely fashion

States central focus clearly

Plans activities to support learning

objectives

Addresses prior learning and prerequisite

skills related to central focus

Addresses personal/cultural/community

assets related to central focus

Plans supports for varied student learning

needs (students with IEPs, ELLs, students

with gaps in prior knowledge, and/or

students needing greater challenge)

Plans formal and informal assessments of

students’ content understanding

Makes assessment adaptations

Plans instructional supports to help

students understand and use academic

language

Addresses the Common Core Standards in

Spanish

Addresses procedural fluency

Addresses conceptual understanding

Teaching the Lesson

Launch/Hook

Very

Effective

Somewhat

Effective

Area for

Growth

Gains students’ attention

Establishes clear purposes

The Middle of the Lesson

Very

Effective

Somewhat

Effective

Area for

Growth

Engages students in developing

understanding of the content

Uses high quality questions to deepen

students’ understanding

Engages students in discussion

Elicits and builds on student responses to

promote thinking and develop

understanding of content

Supports students in using language to

develop understanding of content

Employs suitable pacing in the lesson

Monitors student understanding

Provides feedback to guide further learning

Links instruction to students’ prior learning

and personal, cultural and community

assets

Supports varied student learning needs

Supports students in using academic

language

Supports students in using higher-level

thinking

Closing the lesson

Very

Effective

Somewhat

Effective

Area for

Growth

Focuses student attention on the central

focus of the lesson

Gathers evidence of student learning

Gives follow-up assignments

Promoting a Positive Learning Environment

Very

Effective

Somewhat

Effective

Area for

Growth

Communicates clear expectations

about behavior

Distributes materials efficiently

Avoids unnecessary delays,

interruptions, and digressions

Manages efficient transitions

Provides clear directions

Promotes on-task student behavior

Monitors behavior throughout the room

Very

Effective

Somewhat

Effective

Area for

Growth

Intervenes appropriately when students

are off-task and non-disruptive

Intervenes appropriately when students are

off-task and disruptive to the learning of

others

Demonstrates rapport with and respect for

students

Establishes a challenging positive, low-risk

social environment that promotes mutual

respect among students

Comments on lesson by student teacher (What worked? What didn’t? For whom?

What changes would you make to better support student learning?):

Jasmyn was happy with how the lesson went. She felt that the pacing was purposeful

and appropriate for the audience. She incorporated interactive activities which

limited the lecturing and kept students on task.

Jasmyn feels that one of her strengths as a teacher is relating to students and being

empathetic. She makes efforts to have them feel comfortable with lots of positive

affirmations and clear declarations of support. Because the students have had

multiple tests in recent weeks, Jasmyn made it clear that this project is their

assessment for this unit, which will take the place of the unit exam.

Jasmyn feels that she struggles with classroom management in this section that I

observed. When a student walked out of the classroom after hearing the reminder

that he would be joining the full group for the lesson, she did not follow him. She

relied on Diana's help to return him to the class and was regretful of her passivity

right away. Jasmyn and Diana have spoken about this and Diana has given her a

script from which to work in the future.

Brief summary of lesson by observer:

This lesson was centered around the explanation of a cultural project that will take

the place of a unit exam. Students are to create a powerpoint presentation to try to

convince their classmates that they should go to the country they are promoting.

She gave students a very specific explanation with a clear rubric.

There were 7 (of 10) students present and Jasmyn informed me that the class had

been challenging for her to keep focused and on task.

The lesson began with Jasmyn explaining the project and connecting it to a rubric

used in a prior assignment. She then led them in a discussion on what they knew

about Costa Rica. Students shared their prior knowledge of the country and when

students shared inappropriate comments ("there are a lot of drugs there"), Jasmyn

responded by asking,"Do you have something that is school appropriate?"

After briefly speaking of the five countries from which the students can choose to

prepare a powerpoint, she showed the students a model project (that she prepared)

and asked students to critique it with constructive feedback. Students offered

insightful responses.

Students were then allowed to start their research and Jasmyn circulated around

the room to ensure students were on task and to answer any questions that arose.

Comments on the strengths of this lesson:

Jasmyn was able to keep students on task and redirect any inappropriate comments.

At the beginning of the lesson, when a student had to pronounce "alojamiento"

(lodging), Jasmyn responded by saying, "There it is! The word we are all afraid to

say!" This allowed students to know that Jasmyn understands and can

commiserate with them in their struggles to pronounce challenging vocabulary.

Jasmyn's explanation of the expectations of the project were clear and when

students worked independently, she circulated to ensure students were on task and

to answer any questions they may have had.

Another strength is that Jasmyn showed the students a model project and read it in

English, so they could understand. But, she pointed out that reading it in Spanish

was not allowed and had she been presenting this in class for credit, she would lose

10 points because it was in English.

Comments on areas of needed improvement:

I would suggest that she try to incorporate more Spanish into the lesson. I also

suggested (when a few students expressed concerns about getting in front of the

class to make the presentation) that students could do record their voice on the

powerpoitn and play that on the day of the presentation.

Do you judge this candidate to have:

exceeded expectations in this lesson?

met expectations in this lesson?

met most (but not all) expectations in this lesson?

failed to meet most expectations in this lesson?

2.3.3 Self-Reflection

Journal Entry: March 31

Overall, I was happy with how the lesson went. Even comparing it to the two

other times I taught it that day, I was pleased with my progress and growth over the day.

The pacing was purposeful and appropriate for the audience. Limiting lecture is

important especially at this age group and I was working on presenting all of the

information appropriately and clearly without taking all period. I was able to cut my

presentation down and make it more efficient with each period.

I think one of my strengths as a teacher is relating to my students and being

empathetic. I always try to make them comfortable and lower the affective filter. I do this

with lots of positive affirmations. My host teacher has told me, "Praise in public. Critique

in private." I definitely try to hold true to this mantra and like to use public, vocal praise

very often. I also make it clear when I notice their stress and do my best to remind them

that I will be supporting them every step of the way. This came up in this specific lesson

since the lesson included an introduction to a major assessment. The students have been a

bit overwhelmed with the frequency of assessments in the last two weeks, which is why it

was important to use positive framing when introducing the project. For this reason I

posed it as an opportunity to improve their grades and compared it to an open-book test. I

had not done this in my first class teaching of the day, but was reactive to the high

tension in the air when I announced the Plan a Trip project. For the first class, I had to

react spontaneously and did my best to calm the students and assure them that I would

prepare them well. Nonetheless, I knew my methods could be improved for the rest of the

day and with the help of my host teacher, I revised my announcement of the project.

One of my weaknesses in this lesson was my control of the group of students who

tend to be a bit harder to control. My classroom management skills are still quite amateur

and it is one of my biggest areas of weakness. When Victor walked out of the classroom

after hearing the reminder that he would be joining the full group for the lesson, I did not

follow him. I had relied on my host teacher’s help to return him to the class. I was

regretful of my passivity right away. My host teacher and I have talked about classroom

management and ways I can improve. She gave me a script for students who are not

changing their behavior after two or three reminders. She also allowed me to observe the

other Spanish teacher, whom she believes has a stricter and tougher teaching style.

Whether or not this is true, new experiences and a range of observations will only help

me to be a better teacher.

2.4 Lesson Plan #4: Plan a Trip Project Presentation Day

2.4.1 Lesson Plan

Name

Jasmyn Chacko

Lesson Title

Plan a Trip Project Presentation Day

Date (including day of week)

Thursday, April 6, 2017

Grade Level & Class Title

Spanish Level Three

Period or Block (# of minutes)

2, 4/5, 10

Instructional Context

o What do I know about my students that will inform this lesson? Are there any particular student strengths, interests,

background, needs related to the lesson?

This lesson is part of the same learning segment of Lesson #3: Plan a Trip Project Introduction. Lesson #4 is the final part of

the learning segment because they will presenting the end product, the slideshow, of the week long learning segment. The

presentation has two components: a slideshow and an oral presentation. My students are not used to producing orally in the

target language, especially in a high stakes situation like an assessment. While oral participation is encouraged through

participation points, most of the responses from my students are single word to single sentence responses. This is the first

time they will be speaking publicly for an extended period of time. I could hear the comments of stress and anger when I

announced that this project is completely in Spanish. At least one student in each period that asked if they could do it in

English or what would happen if they did not present at all. As I expected, the slideshow itself was far less of a stressor t han

the speaking portion of the task.

o How does this lesson connect with and build on the previous lessons?

This is the summative assessment for this learning segment. The learning segment prior to this one was a review of the

vocabulary of this lexical set: to travel. Friday through tomorrow is the learning segment of designing a trip. They had three

days in the computer lab to work on this project with the supports of conferences and a graphic organizer (a Cornell note

sheet with the questions that must be in answered within the slideshow).

Central Focus

o What is the central focus for the content in the learning segment?

Students will write and talk about the many aspects of planning a trip in the target language.

Standards

o List state, national, and/or Common Core standards addressed in the lesson.

ACTFL Presentational Communication: Learners present information, concepts, and ideas to inform, explain, persuade, and

narrate on a variety of topics using appropriate media and adapting to various audiences of listeners, readers, or viewers.

Learning Objectives and Assessments

o List the specific content learning objectives for the lesson. What do I want my students to know, understand and do?

How will I assess these objectives?

Learning Objectives

Assessment Plan

Students will be able to describe a future trip they

planned using the prompts given to them.

Students will be assessed based on a rubric that was given to them

on Friday. The rubric can be found in the Appendices.

Needs work: 75 or below

On Target: 80-90

Exemplary: 90+

Students will be able to produce orally in the target

language in a way that would be comprehensible to

an audience.

To complete this task, the student must speak in Spanish as much as

possible and have accurate pronunciation.

Academic Language

o List the academic language function for this lesson.

Inform

Academic language demands

(e.g. vocabulary, syntax, discourse)

Instructional supports to help students use the language function and

address language demands.

Vocabulary: Students will find this vocabulary in

their purple packets. Words include: el aeropuerto,

la llegada, quedarse, el alojamiento, etc.

Discourse: Students will be presenting through

slideshows (they have the choice between Google

Slides or PowerPoint).

Students have many resources for vocabulary including dictionaries,

their notes, and their teachers. More importantly, I have scaffolded

this project with several days of vocabulary practice and review. The

students were assessed on this vocabulary through a quiz on

Thursday and were told that they would need this information for the

project.

Some may not be familiar with the technological demands of

creating a slideshow so I begin the first workshop, which was on

Monday, with an offer to conference with any student in need of

help. I also just roamed and answered questions throughout the

period since most students did not mention they wanted a conference

time. Students will have printed copies of instructions on how to add

accents and instructions on how to submit their projects (how to e-

mail and print in these two softwares).

Instructional Strategies and Learning Tasks (Procedures & Timelines)

o Launch/Hook—How will you start the lesson to engage and motivate students in learning?

Time

Instructional Strategies/Learning Tasks/Questions to

Ask

Rationale/Research & Theory

4 min

Introductions and Agenda: As always, teacher begins

by asking students simple questions in the target

language about their lives. Examples include: “¿Qué

hay de nuevo? ¿Cómo están? ¿Qué vas a hacer después

de la escuela?” After a couple of minutes of

conversation between whole group and teacher, we

switch to English to go over logistics. Teacher reviews

plan for the day, collects any last minute projects, and

answers any pending questions.

This allows for time for logistical needs (collecting

papers, setting up PowerPoints), but also allows

students to release any last minute stresses and

worries. The switch to English is to make the lesson

accessible to all students even those with gaps in

knowledge or who struggle with listening

comprehension in the target language.

3 min

Practice Pronunciation: On the agenda slide, there is

always an essential question in addition to the

activities, homework, and learning objective. The

essential question of this lesson is: “What words are

difficult to pronounce?”

Teacher writes words on the board that she has noticed

have been difficult for students. She points at each one

and models pronunciation. Teacher says: “Repite por

favor.” Class repeats. Each word said aloud two times.

Phonetic lessons and practice are often lost in

foreign language classrooms, despite their

importance. Since the lesson objective lies within

the speaking proficiency, I believe it necessary to

highlight phonetic issues that I usually overlook on

purpose. In other words, I do not always focus on

pronunciation issues and usually only use recasts to

model correct pronunciation. Recasts are the

repetition of the inaccurate pronunciation with the

correct one by the teacher. Unfortunately, students

often do not benefit from this and are sometimes

not even aware of the distinction made by the

teacher. For this reason, it is necessary to include

more explicit instruction of pronunciation every

once in a while. “To achieve authentic and precise

L2 pronunciation ability, students need to be

formally taught how sounds are produced and

encouraged to imitate these sounds. The teacher’s

mere production of the Spanish sounds, without any

explanation of their articulation, may not be

sufficient to ensure accurate student pronunciation

production” (Silvestri, 14-15). I wrote some words

on the board that I saw were proving difficult for

several students. Choosing these words is a reactive

teaching step that addresses a preexisting problem

and presents a solution that is in context with the

rest of the lesson. Integrating the modeling of

pronunciation into the preparation of the

presentations keeps the explicit practice of phonetic

challenges in context with the rest of the unit’s

linguistic skills (in this case, the skills are the

identification and use of the lexical set of travel and

the grammar topics of future tense). “Pronunciation

teaching should be involved contextually with

every other aspect of the L2 learning process, and

not merely be relegated to isolated pronunciation

lessons” (Silvestri, 35).

o Middle of the lesson—What will you do to engage students in developing understanding of the lesson objectives?

Time

Instructional Strategies/Learning Tasks/Questions to

Ask

Rationale/Research & Theory

15 min

Practice Presentations: Teacher has one-on-one

conference time with each student. If a student is not in

One-on-one conferencing is a modification that fits

students with IEPs but helps all students.

a conference, he or she should be practicing on their

phone or with their paper independently or with a

friend.

Additionally, I recognize that this task, presenting

in a foreign language, can be difficult. Public

speaking is uncomfortable for most, especially if it

is a foreign language. To establish a safe and

comfortable, it is important that the teacher relates

to the student and lowers the affective filter.

Conference time accomplishes this by letting a

student practice before the real presentation and by

getting feedback that they can incorporate to

improve their grade. This feedback should be

explicit so that the student may easily apply the

feedback to the upcoming presentation. “The more

the teacher provided explicit feedback on learners'

strategy use and instructed them, the more learners

were motivated to use them effectively. The reason

can be explained as because learners may not be

aware of the strategies in how they can help them

achieve success in the process of language learning,

explicit instruction and feedback on how to use the

strategies more effectively in an explicit format

promoted their learning” (Rahi, 8).

25 min

Presentations: Teacher will call students in alphabetical

order to present, but students are first allowed to

volunteer themselves if they prefer to go first. One

student presents at the Smartboard at a time. Student

should speak entirely in Spanish; he or she may use the

printed copy of their slideshow to read from. Student

may also read from slides or improvise as desired.

If you are not presenting, you are filling in a

“celebration” tab. This is a small piece of paper on

which you should write a compliment about the

presentation. The paper states: “In celebration of (insert

student name). (What I really liked was/ you did a good

This presentation included three main skills:

listening, writing, and speaking. This is an

appropriate speaking task for this level since it

provides the support of a script on screen, while

challenging them to produce in a foreign language

in front of their peers. As for my calling system, I

needed something fair, but that would also allow

students to volunteer, which lowers stress and

strengthens a sense of autonomy in the classroom.

The presentation draws on a variety of skills and

creates a personalized and more engaging learning

experience. “The project activity has a clearly

defined structure and features, among which are the

matching personal needs of students, autonomy at

work, creative tendency, orientation on practical

results. A student takes an active and conscious

participation in the educational process and

significantly increases his or her responsibility for

his or her actions in the learning process and

learning outcomes. Thus, the student summarizes,

analyzes, perceives the information, sets goals and

chooses ways to achieve them, logically true,

convincingly and clearly builds the written and

spoken word, takes the initiative to strive for self-

development, improving their qualifications and

skills, self-acquiring new knowledge, using modern

educational and information technologies” (Lakova

& Chaklikova, 7898).

Students listen to other presentations and react to

them using celebration sheets, which keeps them

accountable for listening and reminds them of the

concrete evidence they should remember when

job of/ props for, etc.).” Each student will write one or

two sentences of praise for each presenter and the

presenter will receive it immediately after their work.

voting for the Best Trip Competition. The voting

will take place when all presentations are complete.

o Closing the lesson—How will you end the lesson?

Time

Instructional Strategies/Learning Tasks/Questions to

Ask

Rationale/Research & Theory

1 min

Clean Up and Closing: Teacher collects extra pink

sheets and printed projects. Teacher reminds students

that if they did not present today, they will present

tomorrow.

Leaving a minute or two at the end of the period

makes classroom management and organization

easier. It is also important to remind students of

their deadlines, so that they do not come in the next

day not ready to present.

Materials and Resources

o List and attach the handouts, notes, books, and other materials you will need for the lesson.

Smartboard to project the slideshows, printed copies of slideshows, rubrics on which to grade, pink compliment sheets

Differentiation/Planned Support For Students

o How will you support students with gaps in the prior knowledge that is necessary to be successful in this lesson?

As I mentioned earlier, a gap in knowledge that would affect this learning segment is that some students may not have as

much experience creating a slideshow, especially in Spanish. I supported these students by offering conferences on Monday

to help them start. Monday through Wednesday I roamed and edited and was available at all times. Lastly, Students will

have printed copies of instructions on how to add accents and instructions on how to submit their projects (for both Google

Slides and PowerPoint).

o Strategies for responding to individual students or groups of students with similar learning styles, needs, IEPs or 504,

ELL. What alternative approaches do you have to content for these students?

Certain students have the opportunity to submit and present tomorrow, or if needed Monday, due to the needs stated by their

IEPs. There will be no penalty.

Another group of students that I must address is those that are more anxious or introverted and have expressed that they do

not feel comfortable speaking publicly. As this is part of the project, I still want them to participate orally in some way, bu t I

also recognize the validity of their anxiety. I offered them two options: they could record their voices and play it with the

PowerPoint or they could present to a smaller group (the two teachers and two peers).

Students who do not have access to internet or computers at home, but needed extra time outside of the three days in the

computer lab, were given options as well. They could come during lunch or after school to use a school laptop.

o Strategies for responding to common errors and misunderstandings. What alternative approaches do you have to

content if you need it?

In the beginning of the lesson, I review the pronunciation of a few words that I noticed many students were struggling to

say. I observed this gap in prior knowledge in the computer lab on Wednesday while students were either speaking to me or

reading their presentations aloud. I address this issue as a whole class and will dress more specific or personal issues in the

one-on-one conferences.

2.4.2 Site Supervisor Observation Report

Student Teacher

Jasmyn Chacko

Cooperating Teacher

Date of Observation

4/6/17

Observer Name and Role

Period or Block (minutes)

Period 10, 48 minutes

Grade Level & Class Title

Spanish 3

Planning the Lesson

Very

Effective

Somewhat

Effective

Area for

Growth

Plans were submitted in a timely fashion

States central focus clearly

Plans activities to support learning

objectives

Addresses prior learning and prerequisite

skills related to central focus

Addresses personal/cultural/community

assets related to central focus

Plans supports for varied student learning

needs (students with IEPs, ELLs, students

with gaps in prior knowledge, and/or

students needing greater challenge)

Plans formal and informal assessments of

students’ content understanding

Makes assessment adaptations

Plans instructional supports to help

students understand and use academic

language

Addresses the Common Core Standards in

Spanish

Addresses procedural fluency

Addresses conceptual understanding

Teaching the Lesson

Launch/Hook

Very

Effective

Somewhat

Effective

Area for

Growth

Gains students’ attention

Establishes clear purposes

The Middle of the Lesson

Very

Effective

Somewhat

Effective

Area for

Growth

Engages students in developing

understanding of the content

Uses high quality questions to deepen

students’ understanding

Engages students in discussion

The Middle of the Lesson

Very

Effective

Somewhat

Effective

Area for

Growth

Elicits and builds on student responses to

promote thinking and develop

understanding of content

Supports students in using language to

develop understanding of content

Employs suitable pacing in the lesson

Monitors student understanding

Provides feedback to guide further learning

Links instruction to students’ prior learning

and personal, cultural and community

assets

Supports varied student learning needs

Supports students in using academic

language

Supports students in using higher-level

thinking

Closing the lesson

Very

Effective

Somewhat

Effective

Area for

Growth

Focuses student attention on the central

focus of the lesson

Gathers evidence of student learning

Gives follow-up assignments

Promoting a Positive Learning Environment

Very

Effective

Somewhat

Effective

Area for

Growth

Communicates clear expectations

about behavior

Distributes materials efficiently

Avoids unnecessary delays,

interruptions, and digressions

Manages efficient transitions

Provides clear directions

Promotes on-task student behavior

Monitors behavior throughout the room

Intervenes appropriately when students

are off-task and non-disruptive

Intervenes appropriately when students are

off-task and disruptive to the learning of

others

Very

Effective

Somewhat

Effective

Area for

Growth

Demonstrates rapport with and respect for

students

Establishes a challenging positive, low-risk

social environment that promotes mutual

respect among students

Comments on lesson by student teacher (What worked? What didn’t? For whom?

What changes would you make to better support student learning?):

Upon reflection, Jasmyn felt that she could have expanded and further clarified the

writing activity of each student writing a compliment sheet. She thought the

motivation for the compliment sheets was effective as it increases accountability for

each student.

Jasmyn felt that biggest issue with this lesson was behavioral management. She felt

that students were disrespectful, off task, rude, and distracting to the presenters.

Jasmyn used certain techniques like oral reminders, suggesting that the student take

a walk in the hall, and proximity. She took Diana's suggestion of a reflection at the

end as a ticket out the door and felt that was a great idea. Jasmyn felt that

implementing was the right thing to do as students had things to say and that there

was a lot of frustration in the room. Although she is not unhappy with how she

handled all of this, but she know there's room to improve.

Jasmyn felt that the presentations ogistically went well because they had each

slideshow already downloaded and opened and the students were given their paper

copies and we had the rubrics.

Brief summary of lesson by observer:

Students were to take the first 15 minutes of class to fine tune and rehearse their

presentations. After that time, students shared their Travel reports in the form of a

power point. Students who were in the audience had to complete a feedback form in

which they were to share what they thought was good about the presentation.

Comments on the strengths of this lesson:

This lesson was well designed, but student behavior was very challenging. While

students read their presentations, two students who are native speakers of Spanish

who were sitting together, laughing and heckling the presenters. She said to one of

the students, "You need to be respectful." When he failed to do so, she asked him,

"Do you need to go outside (in the hall)?" When he continued to be disrespectful

towards his classmate, Jasmyn sat next to him and the behavior subsided.

Jasmyn downloaded students' presentations prior to the beginnning of the

presentations so that the class could run smoothly. Therefore, she had to get up and

move from her spot next to the disruptive student and she sat in the back of the

room, to be able to monitor all students' behavior. When the two students

continued to harass a female presenter, one rather quiet, reserved student became

upset and shouted at the two causing the problems. Jasmyn intervened by telling

everyone to calm down and listen to the presentation.

The young woman presenting was not a native speaker and was very shy about

presenting as she knew that she would be judged by her Spanish speaking peers.

Because of this, she practiced the pronunciation prior to her turn and in previous

class meetings. She did an excellent job and was able to pronounce many

challenging words that would trip up anyone who is new to the language. She also

addressed her classmates at the beginning of her presentation asking them to put

away their phones and pay attention. This was impressive and demonstrated a high

level of maturity.

Jasmyn kept students on task during their peers' presentations by handing out a

strip of paper that said "In celebration of (name student)____" and under it

"Something I enjoyed about the presentation was ____". This activity forced

students to pay attention and find something positive in each of their peers' work.

Because the challenging behavior dominated the presentations, Jasmyn stopped

class early and asked students to take a moment to write down what they could have

done better during the class period. This allowed students to reflect on their

behavior and share their thoughts on the lesson. The feedback facilitated a lively

discussion afterwards, which Jasmyn handled both professionally and sensitively.

Comments on areas of needed improvement:

This is an incredibly challenging class. I think Jasmyn was able to learn a lot from

this lesson and will continue to reflect on it in the future when faced with similar

situations. One suggestion I had was to separate the two disruptive students. They

were sitting next to each other and perhaps they would not have 'fed off eachother'

as much if they were not so close. Another suggestion I have is to give students more

focused expectations for when they are working to prepare and rehearse the lesson.

Many students were off task, but she was able to pull them in and get them focused.

Do you judge this candidate to have:

exceeded expectations in this lesson?

met expectations in this lesson?

met most (but not all) expectations in this lesson?

failed to meet most expectations in this lesson?

2.4.3 Self-Reflection

Journal Entry: April 6

One improvement to the lesson could have been to expand on the writing activity

of each student writing a compliment. I'm thinking of this because edTPA makes us think

of missed opportunities as they call it. I'm not sure I'd call this a missed opportunity

exactly, but perhaps an area to explore in the future. I kept in mind that learners should

not be passive as many professors always told me, which is why my host teacher and I

decided to give the students "celebration sheets" which requires them to praise each

student in one or two sentences for their presentation. This activity increases

accountability for each student must listen more carefully when there is a reflection

following. The only thing is that there was no prompting or guiding for their praises to be

concrete or detailed, so I am not sure they completely fulfilled the purpose of focusing

the students. I wonder if a more elaborate worksheet would have been better with more

prompts. The students could have written each presenter's name, place of choice, the

most appealing part of each possible trip, and then one general piece of positive feedback.

Another benefit is that these sheets would make the transition smoother for the voting

process. While they vote, they could reference this outline of how they felt about each

potential trip.

The biggest issue with this lesson was clearly behavioral management. Like many

other days, I struggled to keep a few students in control. They were disrespectful not only

to me but to each other, off-task, and distracting to the presenters. Specifically, there were

a few native-speakers who were mocking the non-native speakers during the

presentations. They would comment on inaccurate pronunciation, laugh loudly, or ask

sarcastic questions. On top of this, they had their phones out throughout the presentations

and would have full-volume conversations between each other while another student

attempted to speak. I used certain techniques like oral reminders, suggesting that one of

the student take a walk in the hall, and proximity. I sat down next to the students and this

reigned them in a bit, but not enough. If I could do it again, I would also have stopped the

presentations and separated the students before moving on to the rest of the slideshows.

Towards the end of the class, my host teacher suggested we do a reflection at the

end as a “ticket out the door.” A ticket out the door is a slip of paper with a prompt and

students must turn it in before leaving the class. I agreed with her that it would be a good

idea. When the presentations ended, I told students the prompt: Write down something

you could have done better as an audience member today and what was difficult for you

as a presenter. Implementing this quick reflection felt right because I could tell students

had things to say; there was a lot of frustration in the room. I was proud of myself for

taking more initiative in the classroom and confronting an obstacle I had been facing over

the course of the entire semester: classroom management. I felt proud of this step, but

still unsatisfied for I know there's room to improve.

One of the greatest successes despite the disrespect that was present in the

classroom was that one student felt empowered enough to ask students to put their phones

away before she began her presentation. This was a student who had needed extra support

and encouragement to do the presentation in the first place. I had spent most of the

workshop period that was allotted in the lesson plan with her, reading over her slideshow

and modeling proper pronunciation. She had several questions and expressed her

nervousness. A few minutes later when it was her turn to present, she walked up to the

room and addressed the boys who had been misbehaving during the presentations prior to

her own. She asked them firmly to put away their phones and pay attention to her

presentation. My host teacher and I looked at each with surprise and awe. Her confidence

to do this proved that we had created an environment of autonomy and empowerment,

especially considering her initial resistance to presenting.

The presentations in terms of logistics went really well. There was a lot of

preparation to ensure that it was organized and seamless. I had each slideshow already

downloaded and opened; the students were given their paper copies and I had the rubrics.

The transition time between each presentation was minimal, a small but important

success.

Chapter Three: General Reflections

In this chapter, I will answer six questions that require me to reflect on my

performance as a student teacher in the past semester. Some questions may have

subsections for organizational purposes. This section will make references to both

Chapter Two and the Appendices for this section draws all the data together from all of

the lesson plans, reflections, and site supervisor reports gathered over time.

3.1 What main changes did I make as the weeks progressed? Were they positive or

negative changes and to what extent?

3.1.1 Use of the Target Language:

At the start of my teaching in this placement, there was a weak presence of the

target language. Bound by the insecurity to speak in my second language and the

misunderstanding that my students would not understand me in Spanish, I often relied on

English to give instructions, provide feedback, and execute other classroom procedures.

My main method of communicating to students was to speak in English despite the fact

that the content was Spanish. In my study of pedagogy and methods, my professors

always emphasized the use of the target language over the primary language. I whole-

heartedly agreed, but found it more difficult to implement than I imagined.

As previously mentioned, there were two major problems that restricted my use of

the L2, Spanish. They manifested themselves in both how I wrote my lesson plans and

then how I implemented them. In the beginning of my placement, I did not specify in

which language the teacher and students would speak. Phrases like “teacher gives

instructions” and “students answer independently” needed to be modified to include “in

Spanish” or, less frequently, “in English.” At first I did not believe that adding this detail,

which seemed self-explanatory or obvious, would directly affect my teaching. I added it

more for the sake of the reader and to demonstrate the student’s use of the target language

in the classroom. Nonetheless the impact was even bigger than I expected. I began to

write scripted examples of instructions in Spanish within my lesson plans. This was

particularly beneficial to one of the major problems I listed: my concern that students

would not understand if I primarily used Spanish in the classroom.

The class population that serves as the focus for this Capstone project was at the

proficiency level titled Novice Mid by ACTFL (ACTFL, 2017). In more accessible, lay

terms, they were high beginners and could understand simplified sentences in Spanish

whether through reading or listening. My fear was that conducting the entire, or even just

the majority, of the class in Spanish would leave students confused and frustrated. In fact,

at times when I attempted to speak more in Spanish at the beginning of the process, I

often saw visual signs of these two feelings in the body language of my students.

Sometimes they were expressive of their trouble understanding by sighing, asking many

questions, or articulating concerns. My belief that it would not be viable to conduct the

class in Spanish, and then their negative reactions when I did attempt to do so,

discouraged me from continuing to maintain a high level of Spanish in the classroom. My

progress in this area plummeted as I began using a lot of English, especially to explain

directions, procedures, and expectations. In Lesson #1, the instructions for the Mid-Year

Benchmark Speaking practice are given in English, as shown by the lesson plan in

Chapter Two, and the slides are primarily in English, which can be found in the

Appendices. Moreover, in this lesson I instruct the introduction in Spanish and move on

to give the directions in English. This mix between English and Spanish without structure

is problematic because “the constant switching between languages disturbs the natural

learning process of seeking to understand from context, and of gaining confidence that

one can express oneself adequately in the FL {Spanish} without need of the mother

tongue {English}” (Liao, 13). My host teacher and site supervisor both responded with

the suggestion to reincorporate more Spanish as seen in the following quote from the

Mid-Placement Evaluation, which can be referenced to in Appendix B. The prompt asks

the supervisor to list areas in which the candidate should focus on for continued growth;

she responds with,

“Instructing in the target language (more linguistic input) – think of the

simplest way to say things to students using cognates or short phrases to

get the idea across, using lots of visual representations, gestures, etc”

(Appendix B).

My host teacher had similar advice, stating that there were three pillars of increasing the

use of Spanish in a way that is manageable and comprehensible to every student: use of

repetition, cognates, and gestures. Rod Ellis in “Principles of Instructed Second Language

Learning” confirms the value of these methods to providing comprehensible input in the

target language. “If learners do not receive exposure to the target language, they cannot

acquire it. In general, the more exposure they receive, the more and the faster they will

learn” (Ellis, 38). However, it is crucial to realize that he does not simply argue for

increased input, but states that it must be comprehensible “either by modifying it or by

means of contextual support” (Ellis, 39). The three methods suggested by my host teacher

do exactly that; they supplement the spoken Spanish and support students who have

weaker listening comprehension skills or have gaps in knowledge. There is still a lot of

room for me to grow in this area, but there is evidence in the reports by my site

supervisor that I responded appropriately to the feedback by increasing the use of the L2

gradually over the course of the lessons.

As a non-native speaker of Spanish myself, my knowledge of the content has its

limits, which made me nervous. I learned to accept and celebrate my identity as a non-

native speaker, and I found it created a more supportive and positive classroom

atmosphere. When students made mistakes, I was able to praise them for their attempt

and participation. Similarly, there were incidents when I made my mistakes myself, and

students, whether a native or non-native speaker, corrected me. I used these moments to

highlight that I am a student, too, and learning a language is a lifelong process. In her

observations of my lessons, the site supervisor draws attention to this. On February 16

she wrote:

“Also, when a student asked for clarification on a verb conjugation, there

was a bit of confusion as to the correct formation of the verb, but Jasmyn

encouraged the student by saying, ‘Good for you for challenging me, see, I

am learning, too!’...She has established a good rapport with the students”

(Found in Chapter Two under Lesson #1).

I made sure to maintain and expand on this behavior throughout the rest of the placement

as evidenced by the site supervisor’s praise in the final assessment.

“Jasmyn routinely used students' errors as teachable moments, often

connecting her own misconceptions to those of the students. This method

was effective as it demonstrates that teachers are also learners”

(Appendix A).

3.1.2 Lecture-Style Teaching

Earlier in my teaching placement, I instructed in lecture format more often than I

did by the end of my time there. On March 6

, the site supervisor suggested that I

incorporate more interactive activities in which the students are producing in the target

language and not simply listening to me. Under the section titled “Comments on areas of

needed improvement,” she wrote:

“The lesson could have been tighter, with students more focused and using

the target language. Once students get more confident with the

vocabulary, they could do more interactive, communicative activities. But,

this lesson was creating that base from which to grow” (Found in Chapter

Two under Lesson #2).

After reading her constructive criticism, I appreciated the hopeful tone of the last

sentence and intended to make her suggestion a reality.

My struggle was that I thought new information always had to be presented in a

lecture style and did not consider other less traditional possibilities such as inductive

learning. In my earlier lesson plans, I presented the information and had students practice

with minimal interaction. Students were seated for the entirety of the lesson, spoke less

than I did, and were passive, especially if new information was involved. With time, I

addressed this problem by making broader changes to my lesson plans and the

engagement they required, but the first step was simpler. A quick change that kept

students more engaged and pushed them to speak in Spanish, if the written text was in the

target language, was to have students read aloud from worksheets or the board. It was a

small, but important adjustment that kept students more engaged and pushed them to

speak in Spanish if the written text was in the target language. Another quick shift was to

refrain from giving students the translations for each vocabulary list. Instead they were

given the vocabulary in Spanish and told to find the translations with the resources

provided. They could use the textbook, online translators, or dictionaries. More drastic

changes took more time and thought and by the end of my field placement, I was

including more oral activities and even assigned an oral presentation (as found in Lesson

#3 and #4).

In the last month of my field placement, I was incorporating more games and

projects. I utilized the supply of resources online to create thrilling and modern ways to

review vocabulary and grammar from the online application called Kahoot to classic

games like Pictionary. Designing projects for the classroom required more time and

work, but had incredible results. “Method of projects, as learner-centered technology of

the 21

century, is becoming more pronounced creative and social purposes, so that at the

current stage of development of foreign language education is given much attention”

(Lakova & Chaklikova, 7898). I used additional data from these researchers and my own

description in Lesson Plan #4 to further this argument. In the case of Lesson Plan #4, I

felt the Plan a Trip Project better taught and engaged students because the independence

and creativity of the project supported them to be active learners, rather than the passive

learners they were during my lectures.

3.1.3 Understanding of Background Knowledge

One challenge was that I did not have a strong grasp on the breadth of the students’

background knowledge. I often had to ask clarifying questions of my host teacher such as

whether the students had learned the imperfect tense or whether a text would be too

difficult for the class to read. Despite steps I had taken to familiarize myself with the

curriculum, not fully appreciating the extent of student knowledge was a relatively

unavoidable problem in this situation since I was beginning work in a classroom halfway

through the school year and ability levels varied by each individual. My solutions were to

read through old work that my host teacher kept, making sure to read from a broad range

of levels and types of students to elucidate the range of ability in the classroom. I would

also communicate transparently with my students and simply ask them if they had

learned the target structure in question. Many times, that simple question was used to

generate a rich discussion and quick review of an old topic. As a consequence of the steps

I took and the passing of time, my familiarization with the students and their background

knowledge increased and I was better equipped to plan lessons within their ‘zone of

proximal development’ (Vygotsky, 1978), i.e. a level of difficulty that was made

manageable for these students with appropriate instructional scaffolding, and instruct

them using a level of Spanish that was just within their reach. I remember in my first

week always using the phrase “¿Alguien puede leer los instrucciones?” ‘Can someone

read the instructions?’ only to face confusion even after several repetitions. I eventually

realized they had not learned “alguien” ‘anyone’ and I immediately changed the phrase

to “Necesito un voluntario para leer” ‘I need a volunteer to read’, which was met with

raised hands. These changes made huge differences. It was crucial that I understood the

students’ abilities and understood how to communicate with them in Spanish. This

example represents one of my greatest strengths in this teaching context: my willingness

to reflect on my weaknesses and make appropriate changes to improve.

3.2 What motivated me to make these changes? Was it conscious?

The changes I made to my instruction were very conscious and deliberate. In the

reflective journal entries after each lesson, I often mentioned that a constructive criticism

by my host teacher, or by my site supervisor, inspired me to make a certain change or

improve upon a certain skill. This even happened with some regularity within the school

day, influencing how I taught the later classes. When a mid-day change occurred, I wrote

about it in the journal entries to demonstrate how the change over time in my

instructional choices were not just between lessons, but sometimes even within a single

lesson. For example, in the Self-Reflection for Lesson #2, I wrote,

“{The host teacher} had noticed that I would call on a student very

quickly; the hands that are up the quickest are usually those students who

always answer. She gave me this reminder early on in the day so that I

could put it into practice for the rest of the day. I tried it out with mixed

success.”

My appreciation for the experience and expertise of my host teacher was the incentive for

making these changes so immediately. I trusted in her advice to lead me to greater

success.

One of my biggest motivations to make positive changes in the classroom was my

work outside of the classroom on the edTPA certification exam, a New York State

assessment in which future educators, usually student teaching candidates, prove their

readiness to lead a classroom through a series of content-specific tasks. This assessment

requires the candidate to justify all instructional choices using language pedagogy. The

research I read to reference in the edTPA exam exposed me to new techniques to use in

my field placement and, specifically, it led me to review the approach of Universal

Design (UDL Center, 20117). I had originally been exposed to Universal Design (UD) in

a Special Education course, which presented UD as a framework for differentiating and

modifying the classroom in order to make the content accessible and engaging for all

learners. Reading over the theory, I decided to adapt more of its practices in my high

school classroom; my application of this theory to my lesson plans is explained below as

well as in Lesson Plan #3 and #4.

The goal of Universal Design is to design a class for all students without removing

any academic or curricular challenges and goals. There are three main access points in

UD: inputs, engagement, and expression (UDL Center, 2017). Input is the information

that the student receives through listening or reading. Engagement is how the student

interacts with the material and expression is how the student uses the target language.

These are often referred to as the ‘what,’ ‘why,’ and ‘how’ of learning. I decided to start

incorporating this approach by diversifying options for engagement and expression. In

other words, students would have more choice in the classroom and the activities would

require different methods of engagement in order to reach the diverse body of students.

The main principle of Universal Design is that people learn and respond to different

teaching techniques in unique ways; consequently, the teacher must diversify his or her

instructional practices in order to properly provide the opportunity of success for every

student. I felt that the classroom had many traditional forms of assessments and in my

few months there, I had either witnessed or administered several traditional-style quizzes

or exams. I designed two major assessments that defied the typical for this classroom. For

a unit on the future tense, I exchanged the grammar quiz for a brief written composition.

Secondly, the “Plan a Trip” lesson segment, seen in both Lessons #3 and #4 in Chapter 2,

replaced the unit exam for the chapter. These assignments followed UD guidelines by

allowing students to show mastery in an alternative way; instead of completing multiple

choice or fill-in-the-blank sentences under a strict time limit, they could work at their

own pace to complete a writing task or presentation. In addition to proponents of UD,

other researchers see value in creating communicative tasks. Rod Ellis states, “The ability

to get a multiple-choice question right amounts to very little if the student is unable to use

the target feature in actual communication” (Ellis, 41).

3.3 What were my greatest challenges? What were my greatest strengths and

weaknesses? Which populations did I fail to reach?

3.3.1 Challenges and Weaknesses:

One of my greatest challenges this semester was classroom management. I had not

faced this problem, or at least not to the same extent, the prior semester when I had had a

field placement at a middle school. I had expected an increase in issues related to

classroom management; I was also aware that my proximity in age to the students at the

high school would make behavioral problems even more challenging to handle. Some

groups were more difficult than others, and I had one group in particular that struggled to

stay on task and to be respectful and school appropriate. Specifically, my weakness was

that I did not have a full understanding of my disciplinary options as a teacher and of how

to implement them. I initially needed a lot of guidance from my host teacher, but

gradually I asserted myself more.

During phase one and two of the field placement at the high school, I had delegated

all classroom management duties to my host teacher. The expectations outlined by these

two phases allowed me to rely on my host teacher through a co-teaching model. We

deliberated separated our roles to highlight my strengths, which was an instructor rather

than a disciplinarian, and ensure my comfort. Even in the beginning of my independent

teaching, I still relied completely on her for this type of help. She would intervene in the

classroom when necessary and I would step back from my role as primary teacher for the

time needed to calm the classroom or discipline a student. She also handled phone calls

home if a student severely misbehaved, and the paperwork to send the student to an

administrator. It was clear that we had created specific spheres of responsibility, which

we each would oversee, and monitoring behavior fell under her sphere. In my Mid-

Placement Assessment, the supervisor comments on this weakness; in response to the

question of which area should the candidate improve upon, the supervisor wrote:

“Classroom management: refer back to the list of body language/ phrases

to use with students and observe the other Spanish teacher in the building

to get more ideas” (Appendix).

I regret these defined lines that I let become entrenched out of fear, since avoiding

an area of potential growth only limited me as an instructor. Thankfully, however, I did

not let the division of roles continue for the entirety of the field placement. Towards the

end of my time at the high school, I began to assert myself in the realm of classroom

management more frequently. My subsequent development is best represented by the

way the supervisor’s comments on classroom management shifted from the prior tone of

criticism to a new tone of praise. In the End-of-Placement Assessment, the site supervisor

commented:

“When tensions rose in the classroom and personality differences flared

between students, Jasmyn handled herself calmly and professionally and

found a way to diffuse the situation in such a way that students felt heard

and respected.” (Appendix A)

It is noteworthy that this final report was written shortly after “Lesson Plan #5: Plan a

Trip Presentation Day,” a class period that was riddled with student behavioral issues.

“Lesson Plan #5: Plan a Trip Presentation Day” was within the last week of my

field placement. By this point, I had gained more confidence and more willingness to step

outside of my comfort zone. I had made the effort to delve into the classroom

management side of being a teacher, and my host teacher was supporting my pursuit to

take on the extra responsibility. The lesson’s journal entry in Chapter Two reveals the

specifics of the situation, but the most noteworthy detail is the independence and

initiative I displayed in the situation. For so long, I had depended on my host teacher, but

I finally handled a behavior issue using the techniques that my host teacher had taught

and modeled for me. I began with verbal redirection and proximity. When the issue

persisted, I gave the unruly student the option to leave the classroom for a moment.

Ultimately, I needed to terminate classroom activities, have a full group discussion with

the class, and ask certain students to stay after class. Since the group discussion was not

entirely successful in resolving the issue, I notified an administrator, who talked to the

student the following morning. The site supervisor’s observation of this situation may

have led her to include the comment about classroom management in her final

assessment of my teaching. Ultimately, I believe that classroom management was one of

my greatest challenges during the teaching placement and remains an area in which I

must improve.

3.3.2 Least Impacted Population

One population in my classroom that I did not reach to my fullest potential was the

native speakers of Spanish and the heritage learners of Spanish in my classes. Since this

particular school did not have a specific and modified language track for more fluent

Spanish speakers, my host teacher implemented her own, which separated them from the

remainder of the class. These students had the opportunity to use the class time as a

structured study hall or as an independent study in Spanish. In order to begin one of these

options, they had to pass a placement exam that mimicked the final exam of the class.

After completing this requisite, the students would either do independent projects in

Spanish or seek extra help in subjects in which they struggled. During my time as lead

teacher, I occasionally asked them to join the remainder of the class, particularly for

review of the future tense, which they all struggled with on the placement exam. They

also were required to participate in the general classroom if they were off-task and not

using their time productively. Since this program separated them from classroom

procedures and activities, I did not have much direct contact with them. The program

allowed them to be independent and check-in with the teacher minimally. The

consequence of the lack of direct contact with these students is inexperience in and

uncertainty of the instructional techniques that work best for this population of students. I

hope to expand my knowledge in this area in the future.

3.3.3 Strengths:

My greatest strength as an individual has always been my love for people and my

ease working and interacting with others. Without this quality, I probably would not have

considered teaching as a profession for I knew it would be a necessary trait. After an

extended period of working with both children and adults in a professional teaching

capacity, I understand more than ever its importance. Establishing a positive learning

environment for students is possibly the most important ingredient to ensuring success as

a teacher; a positive environment means an environment that is safe, comfortable, and

productive, and I feel I have excelled in this domain as evidenced below.

The School of Education at Syracuse University employs a rubric with five main

standards for student teaching candidates. The fourth standard is titled “Learning

Environment” and states the following: “Teachers work with all students to create a

dynamic learning environment that supports achievement and growth.” Elements of the

environment are listed to further elucidate this expectation, each with its own

explanation. Some highlights include: “supports student diversity,” “interacts with

students,” and “promotes student curiosity and enthusiasm.” I was rated in the top

category (4/4) on three out of the four elements in this standard, making it one of my

strongest attributes (For the full list of elements, see the document titled “End of Year

Assessment by Site Supervisor ” in Appendix A).

Within this same section, the Learning Environment section, I received a score of

three out of four in the fourth element: “organizes and utilizes available resources (e.g.,

physical space, time, people, technology) to create a safe and productive learning

environment.” This element has three requisites: “organizes learning environments,

manages volunteers and/ or paraprofessionals, and establishes classroom safety.” Since I

did not receive the highest possible rating in this category, there is room for

improvement. During my field placement, I rarely collaborated with paraprofessionals,

and I did not participate in a review of safety rules or the design of the classroom since

these procedures usually occur in the beginning of the school year. Thus, although I did

not fulfill my potential in this final element, with my performance in the other elements, I

believe that with sufficient opportunity, I could reach the highest level in the final

element.

Despite a majority of top ratings in creating a positive learning environment, forming

relationships with my students proved to be more difficult than it had been in my

previous placement. In the fall of 2016, I was working part-time as a student teaching

candidate in a suburban middle school. The younger age of my students in comparison to

the later teaching placement made them more receptive to me and facilitated the

formation of relationships. Based on the subsequent experience in a high school, it

seemed that older students needed more time to develop interpersonal connections.

Despite the added time and difficulty, I grew quite close to my high school students and

was consistently strong in the disposition focused on forming relationships throughout

the field placement. The site supervisor commented on this as early as February 16

. In

her report on that day, she pointed out that a student approached me for advice about an

internship application. Both my site supervisor and I agreed that this was a sign that I was

building a strong between the students and me.

In order to develop this rapport with my students, I took great interest in their lives

outside of the classroom and purposefully learned about their interests, dislikes, learning

styles and more. The main way of obtaining this information in an appropriate and

productive way was to use the first few minutes of each period to talk informally in the

target language. As seen in the lesson plans shown in Chapter Two, each lesson began

with an introduction to the day and time to share a fun, upcoming weekend plan or a

stressful moment of the day up to that point. As long as students spoke in Spanish and it

was school appropriate, students could discuss whatever they liked. I used the

information I gathered in these discussions to create learner-oriented examples in my

class and to express regard for the students beyond the content of Spanish.

By my Mid-Placement Evaluation (see Appendix B), the interpersonal relationships

were even stronger, which was noticeable to my site supervisor, “{Jasmyn} connects with

her students. She is invested in their learning” (Appendix B). She supported this written

claim in her rating of me under “Standard 1: Knowledge of Students and Student

Learning.” Specifically, I received the highest available rating (4/4) for “Standard 1.4:

Acquires knowledge of individual students.” My dedication to building connections with

my students continued to the very end of my time with my classes, which she verifies in

the final assessment with the following comment:

“Jasmyn made reference to her students' heritage in lesson plans, inviting

them to share their experiences and perspectives. She also shared her

own experiences with students, which helped her to better connect with

them” (Appendix A).

It was an important success in my eyes to excel in the standard relating to knowledge of

students since I see it as the cornerstone of the profession. Many professors from

Syracuse University and teachers from my other field placements emphasized the value

of developing a connection to my students. This particular host teacher believed

relationship development was especially important in urban settings since, in her

experiences, many of her students lacked strong support systems or positive role models

in their home environments.

3.4 How did this field placement differ from my suburban placement?

3.4.1 The Suburban Placement

In the fall of 2016, I was working part-time as a student teaching candidate. This

was the first part of the student teaching experience as mandated by the School of

Education at Syracuse University. The school in which I worked was a middle school in a

suburb close to the city of Syracuse. This school had 934 students in grades five through

eight. The fifth graders were mostly separated from the rest of the school. There was a

transitional program at the end of the fifth grade to prepare the students to enter the

middle school. 14% of the student body at this school was in Special Education and 1%

was classified as English Language Learners. 7.6% of students were eligible for free

lunch.

I was working in three Spanish classes: in sixth, seventh, and eighth grade classes.

My focus class, which was the one in which I taught, was the latter. The school generally

implemented tracking by ability, but since they did not have sufficient enrollment for two

separate classes, my class was a mixed class of honors and regular students. The Spanish

department did not use a textbook, but rather used a curriculum designed by my host

teacher at the time. There was a great deal of flexibility in terms of the content and the

timeline.

3.4.2 The Urban Placement

From the day of my field placement assignment in an urban high school, my

professors began drawing comparisons, preparing me for what to expect. The data speaks

for itself. In the high school, there were a total of 461 students between grades nine

through twelve. All students received free lunch to provide for the large population (71%)

of students that come from low-income families. 3% of students were English Language

Learners. Students with disabilities made up 14% of the population (NYSED). These

statistics show some differences in the demographics of this field placement in

comparison to my prior experience at the middle school in the suburban school district;

the biggest contrast was the large population of socioeconomically disadvantaged

students in the urban field placement.

The difference in this demographic affected my classroom because my students

often were struggling with issues outside of the classroom that affected their mood,

attendance, and performance in the Spanish class. One of the most prevalent problems I

witnessed was frequent absenteeism. Specifically, I had a Level Three class during the

second period of the day and there was one student who only attended class 38% of the

time. I learned this specific number at a staff meeting, where a statistics specialist

presented spreadsheets to show varying levels of absenteeism with highlights for the

students who were most chronically absent. When approached about the issue, the student

responded that she was in charge of bringing her siblings to the pre-school and

elementary school each morning. Her mother worked more than one job and could not

afford a babysitting service or something similar. The student was acting as a caregiver,

affecting her ability to come to school on time. This situation is only one example of

many students I met who were facing similar difficulties. Similarly, in my former

placement, if a student did not complete his or her homework, the explanation was

usually that he or she forgot. On the other hand, in the urban placement, the excuses were

indicative of how socioeconomic factors affected their education. For example, a typical

explanation would be that the student’s shift was until late at night and he or she fell

asleep without completing the assignment. One student was a mother to a young baby

and would often explain that her responsibilities as a mother inhibited her from excelling

in the class. While students at both placements surely had obstacles, I more often

witnessed ways that the students at the high school were drastically affected by outside

factors.

At times, witnessing these struggles affected my teaching. I knew, despite the

validity of the aforementioned reasons for tardiness, there would need to be consequences

to provide the necessary negative reinforcement of a poor behavior that negatively affect

a student’s education. Tardiness is a “disruption to the general learning process as

students interrupt the class with late entry and teachers take time away from the lesson to

redirect late students for discipline actions...Chronic tardiness and absenteeism

continue{s} to hurt student academic performances” (Quarles, 91). While I understood

the negative effects of absenteeism and desired to maintain a rigorous and organized

learning environment, I also desired to be compassionate to the students and their

personal lives. My host teacher’s policy on late work and retaking assessments was

lenient, but she used participation points as a way to award students for attendance. If a

student was not in class, he or she would receive zero participation points for the day, a

consequence that would not dramatically affect an overall grade if it did not happen

chronically. I felt this combination was a fair and humanistic balance and decided to keep

the same policies in place during my independent teaching.

Another difference between my two field placements was class size. My classes at

the high school were quite small with the largest at thirteen; on the other hand, my classes

at the middle school had twenty to twenty-five students. I enjoyed the smaller class size

because I was able to learn more in-depth about each student and build a stronger rapport.

I had more time to dedicate to each student and see each one improve, which was a

rewarding experience.

3.5 What aspects of these lessons could be transferred to other levels and other

populations? Which would not be so successful in other learning contexts?

Since this teaching placement was in a high school, the maturity of the students

allowed me to plan more frequent and extensive independent work. Especially as I

learned to deviate from lecture style, I gave the students more time to navigate the

material independently. “Changing the ratio of classroom and independent work towards

increasing the share of self-learning in the educational process influenced on the training

of future specialists, competitive on the labor market...and ready for professional growth

and self-developing throughout life” (Masalimova & Chibakov, 2016). This is best

represented in the learning segment called “Plan a Trip.” Two lessons from this week

long segment are shown in Chapter Two, and the portion of the learning segment not

formally shown in the lesson plans was the less teacher-led component, in which students

had three entire class periods of independent workshop time in the computer lab. To

maintain order and productivity, I set out expectations and deadlines at the beginning of

each period, and I roamed around the room to answer questions and make edits.

It will be interesting to see whether and how the skills and techniques I acquired in

the teaching placement described here transfer to other populations given the specialized

nature of the school. The educational context in which I will join for the coming 2017-

2018 academic year is rather different: teaching English in an elementary school in

Madrid, Spain. Not only will the students be younger and the target language different,

this will be a context of Content and Language Integrated Learning (Snow, 2013), where

native-Spanish speakers learn English in both language and content classes. Despite the

many aspects of the new setting that are unfamiliar to me, moving from assisting in a

suburban middle school to full blown teaching in an urban high school has shown me that

I have the flexibility, perseverance, and commitment to development to take on this next

step.

3.6 Did my activities align with a specific pedagogical approach or theory? Have I

begun to create my own teaching style?

I strongly believe in the pedagogical approach of Communicative Language

Teaching, which I was exposed to mainly in my Linguistics class with Professor Amanda

Brown, who became my advisor for the Capstone project. Communicative Language

Teaching (CLT) is a methodology that employs learner-centered activities and real-world

situations with the goal of “the teaching of communicative competence, which includes

grammatical competence, sociolinguistic competence, discourse competence and

strategic competence” (Liao, 26). While I did not set out to fully adopt this approach, its

features when designing my plans often inspired me. I particularly agree with its values

of student choice, personalized learning, and communicative proficiency and wanted to

incorporate them into my teaching.

Communicative Language Teaching has been gaining more popularity as the

globalized world begins to value students’ ability to truly communicate rather than the

ability to pass an exam. ACTFL, an association that writes standards for foreign language

classrooms in the USA, also greatly values communicative proficiency for the purpose of

globalization; in fact, its statement of philosophy asserts, “The United States must

educate students who are linguistically and culturally equipped to communicate

successfully in a pluralistic American society and abroad” (ACTFL). This appreciation

for communication has not always been at the core of language classes.

“Although the concept of communication underlying CLT may seem self-

evident as a goal for language education, a generation ago (and still in

many parts of the world today) teaching and learning another language

were often more concerned with language analysis, literary text analysis,

memorization, translation, or high-stakes multiple-choice language

testing” (Duff, 15).

With CLT as the mainstream pedagogical approach, the language classroom should

include more discussions, practice of speech acts such as forgiving and persuading, and

culturally fluent communication. These new emphases motivated me to align my teaching

more closely to CLT principles.

Unfortunately, implementing CLT-infused practices proved to be difficult. As Duff

(2013) comments,

“Even teachers who subscribe to the principles of communicative

methodology must sometimes compromise their own beliefs about

instruction to prepare students for the high-stakes assessment that might

rewards very traditional forms of knowledge, such as grammar and

detection of written errors” (Duff, 25).

While there was no high-stakes assessment during the teaching placement described in

the current project, I faced a similar hesitation to implement CLT models when there

were upcoming classroom-based assessments. The in-class quizzes and tests required

students to translate vocabulary, use target words in a sentence, fill in blanks, and

complete other traditional linguistic tasks. To prepare students for these assessments, I

often felt bound to the traditional-style drills that mimicked the style of the tests. Such

practices are known as “washback”, which Duff (2013) describes as having a negative

impact on teaching.

“This negative effect of assessment practices on teaching, known as

negative washback, plagues language teaching all over the

world...{communication skills} are more expensive and logistically

challenging to assess than grammatical or lexical knowledge” (Duff, 25).

For this reason, CLT was not always appropriate or easy to apply to the classroom.

One way I combated 'negative washback' was to modify the assessment to follow

more CLT principles. As previously mentioned, I designed two major assessments, a

writing composition using the future tense and the “Plan a Trip” slideshow, each of

which replaced a quiz and an exam, respectively. By creating assessments that were less

traditional, the precursory lessons were less bound to tradition as well. Specifically, I

attempted to follow many CLT principles in the learning segment that culminated in the

“Plan a Trip” presentations, examples of which follow.

The “Plan a Trip” lesson segment was a week long and the first and final lesson plans

are included in Chapter Two. Using authentic texts is a primary element of the CLT

approach. Liao (2013) defines authentic materials as “pieces of language, either spoken

or written, which were originally messages produced for communication in a non-

teaching situation” (Liao, 20). For the ‘Plan a Trip’ project, the students received a list of

countries and a corresponding website. I chose to assign each of the designated countries

an authentic website instead of creating my own tourist materials or allowing students to

choose their own source. I required them to use the websites I had assigned because they

comprised ‘realia’, i.e. genuine, linguistically rich resources that would be used outside of

an educational context. In this case, the websites were tourist sites of Spanish-speaking

countries that provided their information in both Spanish and English.

According to Liao (2013), CLT requires that teachers “create real life situations in

classes and have students play roles, simulations, true-to-life interactions, and other

communicative activities” (Liao, 9). Designing an ideal trip may have been engaging and

open to student choice, but the reality is that it was not a true-to-life situation. When I

said there was a prize for the student voted to have designed the best trip, one student

even joked, “Is the prize that we get to go on the trip?” If I could actually have taken

them on the trip, then it would have fit CLT guidelines, but of course that was not

feasible. Arguably, the task I had assigned, to design a trip, still possessed some

authenticity since the student may need or want to use those skills outside of an

educational context later on his or her life. “Research has found that having a personal or

professional goal for learning English can influence the need and desire for native-like

pronunciation” (Gilakjani, 76). I also recommended that students considering applying to

Syracuse University choose Chile or Spain for their project since the University has study

abroad programs in those two locations. I knew some students who had expressed interest

in attending Syracuse University and potentially studying abroad; I capitalized on this

information to make the task more authentic to this population.

Navigating a new classroom, new age group, and new responsibilities as I began

teaching my own class full-time, I did not always complete my goals as planned.

Thankfully, I still have time to learn and grow. With regards to the CLT approach, I

would like to explore its practices more in my next teaching position, which will be as an

English teacher in a Spanish elementary school. Once again, the learning context in

which I will teach will change dramatically and I will continue to learn about different

student populations and teaching styles. Despite the clear differences between my future

placement and my previous experiences, there are so many lessons I have learned by

completing an intensive, structured reflection of my semester as a student teacher that

will remain with me not only in Spain, but when I return to hopefully obtain a teaching

position here in New York. Besides the specific elements of my teaching that I have

analyzed in this project, the most powerful lesson I have gained from this project is that

there will always be room to improve. We should never be completely satisfied with our

product for there will always be new research, the need to update material to make it

current and engaging, and personal limitations to address. It turns out that as teachers, we

are also students – students for life.

Works Cited

“Learning Standards for Languages Other Than English.” New York State Education

Department. 2017. http://www.nysed.gov/common/nysed/files/programs/world-

languages/lotelea

Brinton, Donna M. “Tool and Techniques of Effective Second/ Foreign Language

Teaching.” Teaching English as a Second or Foreign Language, 4

edition. National

Geographic Learning and Heinle Cengage Learning, 2014.

Nunan, David. “Task-Based Teaching and Learning.” Teaching English as a Second or

Foreign Language. National Geographic Learning and Heinle Cengage Learning, 2014.

Ellis, Ron. “Principles of Instructed Second Language Learning.” System Volume 33,

Issue 2. University of Auckland, June 2005.

Snow, M. A. “Content and immersion models of second/foreign language teaching.”

Teaching English as a Second or Foreign Language. 2013. pp. 438-454.

“UDL Guidelines Educator Checklist.” UDL Center. Cast Tremaine Foundation, June 18,

2015. <www.udlcenter.org>

“Standards Summary.” ACTFL. American Council on the Teaching of Foreign

Languages, 2017. <https://www.actfl.org>

Duff, Patricia A. “Communicative Language Teaching.” Heinle Cengage Learning, 2014.

Liao, Xiao Qing. Communicative Language Teaching: Approach, Design and Procedure.

01 Jan. 2000. EBSCOhost.

Vygotksy, L. Mind in Society. Cambridge, MA. MIT Press, 1978.

Thompson, Gregory L.1 and Katie2 Harrison. "Language Use in the Foreign Language

Classroom." Foreign Language Annals, vol. 47, no. 2, June 2014, pp. 321-337.

EBSCOhost.

Ugur, Hasan. “Self-Awareness and Personal Growth: Theory and Application of Bloom's

Taxonomy." Eurasian Journal of Educational Research (EJER), no. 60, Summer2015,

pp. 89-110. EBSCOhost.

Silvestri, L. M. “The effect of additional pronunciation instruction on students'

confidence, motivation and overall comprehensibility in the second language classroom.”

1997. ProQuest Dissertations & Theses Global. <https://search-proquest-

com.libezproxy2.syr.edu/docview/304387902?accountid=14214>

Guardino, C., & Fullerton, E. K. (2014). Taking the time out of transitions. Education &

Treatment of Children, 37(2), 211-228. < https://search-proquest-

com.libezproxy2.syr.edu/docview/1540733135?accountid=14214>

Lavell, JH. Metacognition and cognitive monitoring: a new area of psychological inquiry.

Am Psychology, 1979. pp. 906-911.

Horwitz, Elaine K., et al. “Foreign Language Classroom Anxiety.” The Modern

Language Journal, vol. 70, no. 2, 1986, pp. 125–132., <www.jstor.org/stable/327317>

Price, M. L. (1988). Anxiety and the foreign language learner: Correlates of foreign

language anxiety. ProQuest Dissertations & Theses Global. (303711646). <

https://search-proquest-com.libezproxy2.syr.edu/docview/303711646?accountid=14214>

Mueller, Gunther A. “Visual Contextual Cues and Listening Comprehension: An

Experiment.” The Modern Language Journal, vol. 64, no. 3, 1980, pp. 335–340.

<www.jstor.org/stable/324500>

Van de Pol, Janneke, et al. “Scaffolding in Teacher—Student Interaction: A Decade of

Research.” Educational Psychology Review, vol. 22, no. 3, 2010, pp. 271–296.

Rahi, M. (2013). The effect of explicit feedback on the use of language learning

strategies: The role of instruction. Dil Ve Edebiyat Egitimi Dergisi, 2(5), pp. 1-12.

Nunan, D. “Learner strategy training in the classroom: An action research study.”

Methodology in language teaching: An anthology of current practice. Cambridge:

Cambridge University Press, 2002. pp.133-143

Radhakrishna, Rama, John Ewing, and Naveen Chikthimmah. "TPS (Think, Pair and

Share) as an Active Learning Strategy." NACTA Journal, vol. 56, no. 3, 2012, ProQuest

Central. pp. 84-85.

Quarles, Donald. “An Analysis of Tardiness, Absenteeism, and Academic Achievement

of 9th Grade Students in a Selected School District in Southeastern Georgia.” South

Carolina State University, Ann Arbor, 2011, ProQuest Dissertations & Theses Global.

“Enrollment Data.” New York State Education Department (NYSED), 2017.

<https://data.nysed.gov>

Carvalho, Candida M. M. d. “Vocabulary Teaching and Learning Strategies in a

foreign/second Language.” University of Nebraska at Kearney, Ann Arbor, 2013,

ProQuest Dissertations & Theses Global.

Gilakjani, Abbas Pourhossein. “Why is Pronunciation So Difficult to Learn?” Univeristy

of Malaysia, 2011. pp.74-83.

Masalimova, A.R. & Chibakov, A.S. “Experimental Analytical Model of Conditions and

Quality Control of Vocational Training of Workers and Specialists.” IEJME-Mathematics

Education, 2016.

Lakova, Assel & Chaklikova, Assel. “Management of Students’ Independent Work

through the Project Technology in Foreign Language Education.” International Journal

of Environmental and Science Education, v11 n15. 2016. pp.7888-7898.

Appendices

A. End-of-Placement Report

End-of-Placement Field Performance Assessment (Decision Point 3B)

Candidate’s name

Jasmyn Chacko

Reviewer’s name

Program

Spanish Education

School

Decision Point

Date

4/17/17

Please assess the candidate’s performance on each part of each standard and disposition using the following scale:

The candidate demonstrates:

4 = Evidence that the candidate is highly effective at this stage of his/her program.

3 = Evidence that the candidate is effective at this stage of his/her program.

2 = Evidence that the candidate is developing at this state of his/her program.

1 =Evidence that the candidate is ineffective at this stage of his/her program.

Please refer to the SU-adapted NYSUT Teacher Practice Rubric for description of evidence of “highly effective”, “effective”,

“developing” and “ineffective” practice for each element indicator rating.

NEW YORK STATE TEACHING STANDARDS — The teacher candidate …

RATIN

EVIDENCE

Standard 1: Knowledge of Students and Student Learning

Teachers acquire knowledge of each student, and demonstrate knowledge of student development and learning to promote achievement

for all students.

Element 1.1: Demonstrates knowledge of child and adolescent

development including students’ cognitive, language, social,

emotional, and physical levels.

 Describes and plans using knowledge of developmental

characteristics of students

1.1

Jasmyn responded to students' needs in a variety of

by recognizing strengths and where they needed to

imrove. She incorporated ways which helped her

to connect with students who were struggling and

not motivated.

Element 1.2: Demonstrates current, research-based knowledge of

current research in learning & language acquisition theories and

processes

 Uses strategies to support learning and language acquisition

 Uses current research

1.2

Element 1.3: Demonstrates knowledge of and is responsive to

diverse learning needs, strengths, interests, and experiences of

students.

 Plans for student strengths, interests, experiences to meet

diverse learning needs of each student

1.3

See comment in 1.1

Element 1.4: Acquires knowledge of individual students from

students, families, guardians/other caregivers to enhance student

learning.

 Communicates with parents, guardians and/or caregivers

1.4

Jasmyn was able to communicate with parents

once, but did not do so on a regular basis.

Element 1.5: Demonstrates knowledge of and is responsive to

economic, social, cultural, linguistic, family & community factors

that influence his/her students’ learning.

 Incorporates the knowledge of school, community &

environmental factors.

 Incorporates multiple perspectives

1.5

Jasmyn recognized that students were not getting

the same academic support outside of the

classroom and was able to offer extra supports in

the class so students could be successful.

Element 1.6: Demonstrates knowledge and understanding of

technology& information literacy and how they affect student

learning.

 Understands technological literacy and its impact on student

learning.

1.6

Jasmyn used a variety of technological resources to

enrich her lessons

Standard 2: Knowledge of Content and Instructional Planning

Teachers know the content they are responsible for teaching, and plan instruction that ensures growth and achievement for all students.

Element 2.1: Demonstrates knowledge of the content they teach,

including relationships among central concepts, tools of inquiry,

structures and current developments within their discipline(s).

 Understands key discipline concepts, themes, learning

standards & key disciplinary language

 Uses current development in pedagogy and content

2.1

Element 2.2 Understands how to connect concepts across

disciplines, and engages learners in critical and innovative

thinking and collaborative problem-solving related to real world

contexts

 Incorporates diverse social and cultural perspectives

 Incorporates individual and collaborative critical thinking

and problem solving

 Incorporates disciplinary and cross-disciplinary learning

experiences

2.2

Jasmyn made reference to her students' heritage in

lesson plans, inviting them to share their

experiences and perspectives. She also shared her

own experiences with students, which helped her to

better connect with them.

Element 2.3: Uses a broad range of instructional strategies to

make subject matter accessible.

 Designs learning experiences that connect to students’ life

experiences

 Designs self-directed learning experiences

2.3

Jasmyn not only connected with students'

experiences, but had them open their perspectives

by researching other countries that they would like

to visit. This allowed students to design their own

learning. The students then shared their research in

the form of a travel project which was presented in

powerpoint slides and an oral presentation.

Element 2.4: Establishes goals and expectations for all students

that are aligned with learning standards and allow for multiple

pathways to achievement.

 Articulates learning objectives/goals with learning

standards

2.4

Element 2.5: Designs relevant instruction that connects students’

prior understanding and experiences to new knowledge.

 Designs instruction using current levels of student

understanding

 Designs learning experiences using prior knowledge

2.5

Writing assignments were clearly explained with

rubrics and model assignments were shown so that

students knew exactly what was expected of them.

Element 2.6: Evaluates and utilizes curricular materials and other

appropriate resources to promote student success in meeting

learning goals .

 Organizes time

 Selects materials and resources

2.6

Standard 3: Instructional Practice

Teachers implement instruction that engages and challenges all students to meet or exceed the learning standards.

Element 3.1: Uses research-based practices and evidence of

student learning to provide developmentally appropriate and

3.1

Jasmyn rutinely used students' errors as teachable

moments, often connecting her own

standards-driven instruction that motivates and engages students

in learning.

 Aligns instruction to standards

 Uses research-based instruction

 Engages students

misconceptions to those of the students. This

method was effective as it demonstrates that

teachers are also learners.

Element 3.2: Communicates clearly and accurately with students

to maximize their understanding and learning.

 Provides directions and procedures

 Uses questioning techniques

 Responds to students

3.2

Element 3.3: Sets high expectations and creates challenging

learning experiences for students.

 Articulates measure of success

 Implements challenging learning experiences

3.3

While Jasmyn encouraged students to work to their

potential, I feel that some students could have been

pushed more. I believe that when Jasmyn is in her

own classroom, she will be able to establish a

learning environment in which students are

challenged and feel comfortable taking the risks

necessary to learn a language.

Element 3.4: Explores and uses a variety of instructional

approaches, resources, and technologies to meet diverse learning

needs, engage students, and promote achievement.

 Differentiates instruction

 Implements strategies for mastery of learning outcomes

3.4

Element 3.5: Engages students in the development of

multidisciplinary skills, such as communication, collaboration,

critical thinking, and use of technology .

 Provides opportunities for collaboration

 Provides synthesis, critical thinking, and problem solving

3.5

I observed a lesson in which the students worked

together to offer feedback, support and

constructive criticism on a project. However, there

were many opposing opinions in the class and at

times the discussion became heated. Jasmyn

handled the situation professionally and de-

escalated the situation by opening the lesson to

class discussion and sharing of opinions. This

allowed students to be heard and demonstrated

respectful discussion and disagreement.

Element 3.6: Monitors and assesses student progress, seeks and

provides feedback, and adapts instruction to student needs.

 Uses formative assessment to monitor and adjust pacing

 Provides feedback during and after instruction

3.6

Standard 4: Learning Environment

Teachers work with all students to create a dynamic learning environment that supports achievement and growth.

Element 4.1: Creates a mutually respectful, safe, and supportive

learning environment that is inclusive of every student.

 Interacts with students

 Supports student diversity

 Reinforces positive interactions among students

4.1

See comments in 3.5

Element 4.2: Creates an intellectually challenging and stimulating

learning environment .

 Promotes student pride in work and accomplishments

 Promotes student curiosity and enthusiasm

4.2

Jasmyn often wrote students notes, commending

them on a job well done. On the travel project,

students who were not presenting were asked to

write a positive remark to those who had

presented. This allowed students to take pride in

their own work and to celebrate the efforts of their

peers.

Element 4.3: Manages the learning environment for the effective

operation of the classroom.

4.3

 Establishes routines/procedure/transition and expectations

for student behavior

 Establishes instructional groups

Element 4.4: Organizes and utilizes available resources (e.g.,

physical space, time, people, technology) to create a safe and

productive learning environment.

 Organizes learning environments

 Manages volunteers and/or paraprofessionals

 Establishes classroom safety

4.4

Standard 5: Assessment for Student Learning

Teachers use multiple measures to assess and document student growth, evaluate instructional effectiveness, and modify instruction.

Element 5.1: Designs, adapts, selects, and uses a range of

assessment tools and processes to measure and document student

learning and growth.

 Designs and/or selects assessments to establish learning

goals and inform instruction

 Measure and records student achievement

 Aligns assessment to learning goals

5.1

Element 5.2: Understands, analyzes, interprets, and uses

assessment data to monitor student progress and to plan and

differentiate instruction.

 Uses assessment data as feedback to set goals with students

 Engages students in self-assessment

5.2

Element 5.3: Communicates information about various

components of the assessment system.

 Accesses, analyzes and interprets assessments

5.3

Element 5.4: Reflects upon and evaluates the effectiveness of the

comprehensive assessment system to adjust assessment and plan

instruction accordingly.

 Understands assessment measures and grading procedures

 Establishes an assessment system

5.4

Jasmyn sets clear expectations and when a

written/oral project was assigned in place of a

formal written assessment, she explained the

difference to the students and effectively

explained the rubric.

Element 5.5: Prepares students to understand the format and

directions of assessments used and the criteria by which the

students will be evaluated.

 Communicates purposes and criteria

 Provides preparation and practice

5.5

Standard 6: Professional Responsibilities and Collaboration

Teachers demonstrate professional responsibility and engage relevant stakeholders to maximize student growth, development, and

learning.

Element 6.1: Upholds professional standards of practice and

policy as related to students’ rights and teachers’ responsibilities.

 Demonstrates ethical, professional behavior

 Advocates for students

 Demonstrates ethical use of information and information

technology

 Completes training to comply with State and local

requirements and jurisdictions

6.1

Element 6.2: Engages and collaborates with colleagues and the

community to develop and sustain a common culture that supports

high expectations for student learning.

 Supports the school as an organization with a vision and a

mission

 Participates on an instructional team

6.2

Diana told me of many times that Jasmyn

participated and supported the rest of the

department.

 Collaborates with the larger community

Element 6.3: Communicates and collaborates with families,

guardians, and caregivers to enhance student development and

success.

 Communicates student performance to families

6.3

Element 6.4: Manages and performs non-instructional duties in

accordance with school district guidelines or other applicable

expectations.

 Maintains records

 Manages times and attendance

 Maintains classroom and school resources and materials

 Participates in school and district events

6.4

Element 6.5: Understands and complies with relevant laws and

policies as related to students’ rights and teachers’ responsibilities.

 Communicates policies

 Maintains confidentiality

 Reports concerns

 Adheres to policies and contractual obligations and accesses

resources

6.5

Standard 7: Professional Growth

Teachers set informed goals and strive for continuous professional growth.

Element 7.1: Reflects on own practice to improve instructional

effectiveness and guide professional growth.

 Reflects on evidence of student learning

 Plans professional growth

7.1

Over the year, Jasmyn and I spoke about how to

modify lessons to suit different learning styles.

Element 7.2: Sets goals for, and engages in, ongoing professional

development needed to continuously improve teaching

competencies.

 Sets goals

 Engages in professional growth to expand knowledge base

7.2

Element 7.3: Communicates and collaborates with students,

colleagues, other professionals, and the community to improve

practice.

 Gives and receives constructive feedback

 Collaborates

7.3

Element 7.4: Remains current in knowledge of content and

pedagogy by utilizing professional resources.

 Accesses professional memberships and resources

7.4

Jasmyn attended the NYSAFLT Conference in

October, but I would encourage her to seek out

more opportunities for development.

The Scale for Use in Rating Candidates’ Dispositions

4 = There is clear and consistent evidence of a commitment to most or all of the values of this disposition.

3 = There is clear evidence that reflects a commitment to the values of this disposition.

2 = There is little or no evidence of a commitment to the values of this disposition.

1 = Evidence is markedly inconsistent with the values of this disposition.

DISPOSITIONS (Behaviors reflective of particular commitments, habits, attitudes and values)

D1 Demonstrates a clear and consistent commitment to the development of personal

maturity

D2 Demonstrates a clear and consistent commitment to one’s own personal professional

growth and accountability.

Comments on candidate’s overall professional development over the course of his/her placement:

I believe that this placement was one that both challenged Jasmyn and broadened her perpective. The

students' academic ability and motivation levels in this placement were quite diverse. Jasmyn recognized

this and was able to connect with students in such a way that demonstrated to them that she was invested in

their learning. When tensions rose in the classroom and personality differences flared between students,

Jasmyn handled herself calmly and professionally and found a way to diffuse the situation in such a way

that students felt heard and respected.

I also saw direct evidence of Jasmyn's supportive nature. One student was struggling with pronunciation

and was quite nervous prior to her oral presentation. When the student presented and was able to

comfortably pronounce the challenging words (after practicing with Jasmyn and a class mate), the proud

smile that spread across this student's face was contagious. These small, proud moments are what students

hold on to and use as catalysts for growth as they are instilled with the confidence necessary to take the

risks to effectively communicate in the target language.

B. Mid-Placement Report

Student Teaching Mid-Placement Performance Assessment for Undergraduate

Inclusive Elementary/Special Education Program

Course

EDU 508

Date

March 13, 17

Student

Jasmyn Chacko

Cooperating

Teacher

Supervisor

Midterm

Comments

D3 Demonstrates a clear and consistent commitment to diversity and equity.

D4 Demonstrates a clear and consistent commitment to subject matter excellence.

D5 Demonstrates a clear and consistent commitment to professional ethics and integrity,

professional standards of practice and the profession at large.

4 = Highly Effective at this stage of his/her program.

3 = Effective at this stage of his/her program.

2 = Developing at this stage of his/her program

1 = Ineffective at this stage of his/her program

Tea

Stud

Sup

Standard 1: Knowledge of Students and Student Learning

1.1

Demonstrates knowledge of child and adolescent development

1.2

Demonstrates knowledge of current research in learning

1.3

Demonstrates knowledge of diverse learning needs

1.4

Acquires knowledge of individual students

I always try to

incorporate

personal

information

about the

students during

the introduction

such asking a

student about an

interview or a

weekend plan I

remember he or

she had. I've

also been

approached by a

student for

internship

advice and I

check in on that

when there is

extra time. -

Jasmyn

1.5

Demonstrates knowledge of factors that influence learning

1.6

Demonstrates knowledge of and understanding of technology

Standard 2: Knowledge of Content Knowledge and Instructional Planning

2.1

Demonstrates sound knowledge of content

2.2

Understands how to connect concepts across disciplines

Both here and

for 3.5 I

struggle. I am

not sure how to

incorporate

other disciplines

into this

classroom right

now. - Jasmyn

2.3

Uses a broad range of instructional strategies

2.4

Establishes measurable goals and objectives

Each agenda

includes a Can

Do Statement

that lists a

measurable

goal.

2.5

Designs relevant instruction

2.6

Evaluates and utilizes curricular materials

Standard 3: Instructional Practice

3.1

Uses research-based practices

Sometimes

when I use

techniques I

learned in RED

326, LIN 421,

or Methods, I

cannot cite the

theory or

research behind

it. I can give a

rationale using

layman's terms

and I often rely

on common

sense and my

instinct. -

Jasmyn

3.2

Communicates clearly and accurately

3.3

Sets high expectations

3.4

Explores and uses a variety of instructional approaches

3.5

Engages students in the development of multidisciplinary skills

3.6

Monitors and assesses student progress

Standard 4: Learning Environment

4.1

Creates an inclusive learning environment

4.2

Creates a stimulating learning environment

I am in between

a 3 and a 4 here.

I have used a lot

of lecture in the

last week, but I

also know that I

always like to

create games for

the students and

am trying to

keep the

activities

modern,

stimulating, and

fun. - Jasmyn

4.3

Manages the learning environment effectively

4.4

Organizes and utilizes available resources

Standard 5: Assessment for Student Learning

5.1

Designs adapts, selects and uses a range of assessment tools

5.2

Understands, analyzes, interprets, and uses assessment data

5.3

Communicates assessment information

5.4

Reflects upon and evaluates the effectiveness of assessment

5.5

Prepares students to understand assessments

Standard 6: Professional Responsibilities and Collaboration

6.1

Upholds professional standards of practice and policy

6.2

Engages and collaborates with colleagues

6.3

Communicates and collaborates with families

6.4

Manages and performs non-instructional duties.

6.5

Understands and complies with relevant laws and policies

Standard 7: Professional Growth

7.1

Reflects on own practice

Jasmyn and I

have had many

conversations

about her

lessons and I

know that she

daily reflects on

lessons and how

to improve them

moving

forward.

7.2

Sets goals for, and engages in ongoing professional development

Was able to

attend PD

during

Superintendent's

Day, attended

NYSAFLT

Conference in

November as an

assistant -

Jasmyn

7.3

Communicates and collaborates with others

7.4

Remains current in knowledge of content and pedagogy

At this stage in the placement, what areas should the candidate focus for continued professional

growth?

1. Instructing in the target language (more linguistic input) - think of the simplest way to say

things to students using cognates or short phrases to get the idea across, using lots of visual

representations, getstures, etc.

2. Classroom management: refer back to the the list of body language/phrases to use with students

and observe the other Spanish teacher in the building to get more ideas.

Other comments and suggestions:

Jasmyn is doing an excellent job so far. She is hardworking, motivated, attentive to student needs,

and quickly incorporates feedback.(Diana)

Jasmyn is open to ideas and connects with her students. She is invested in their learning. (Katie)

C. Lesson #1 Class Materials

D. Lesson #3 Class Materials

D.1 Rubric for the Plan a Trip Project

¡Planea un viaje! Rubric

10 points ____ Student created an engaging introduction slide and concluding final slide.

10 points ____ Student completed “Paso 1.” He or she chose one of the specified

locations and included a slide answering the designated questions.

10 points ____ Student completed “Paso 2.” He or she describes at least two activities to

do and at least two places to visit.

10 points ____ Student completed “Paso 3.” He or she states the dates of the trips and

talks about the transportation that will be used.

10 points ____ Student has minimal grammatical errors. Errors do not hinder

comprehensibility.

10 points ____ Student used pictures and descriptions for each picture.

10 points ____ Student used a wide variety of vocabulary that is representative of a Level

Three student (use the purple packet).

10 points ____ Student completes the task with many details about the trip.

10 points ____ Student made a slideshow that was visually engaging and organized.

10 points ____ Student presented to the class entirely in Spanish.

100 points

*** Chispas****

5 points ____ Student won the competition of who created the best trip.

D.2 Cornell Research Sheet for the Plan a Trip Project

Class Notes

Task: Plan a Trip!

Write out your research here in bullets or

sentences (always in Spanish!) to prepare you

before you begin making your slideshow!

Preguntas:

Name:______________________________

Class:______________________________

Period:______________________________

Date:________________________________

Respuestas:

Elige el destino

1. ¿A qué lugar te gustaría viajar?

2. ¿Por qué?

3. Escribe 2 argumentos para convencer a tus

compañeros.

Busca información

1. ¿Cómo llegaremos?

2. ¿Cuáles lugares visitaremos? ¿Por qué

quieres ir a esos lugares?

3. ¿Qué actividades quieres hacer?

Planifica el viaje

1. ¿En qué fechas va a ser? ¿Por qué elegiste

estas fechas?

2. ¿Qué medio(s) de transporte van a utilizar?

3. ¿Dónde se van a alojar? ¿Por qué elegiste

este sitio?

Detalles Especiales y Chispas